![Sample our Politics & International Relations journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5947/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Politics-International-Relations.jpg"})
Notes
1. See, for example, Robert T. Foley, ‘A Case Study in Horizontal Military Innovation: The German Army, 1916–1918,’ Journal of Strategic Studies 35/6 (Dec. 2012), 799–827; David French, ‘Winning and Losing on the Western Front: The British Third Army and the Defeat of Germany in 1918,’ Journal of Strategic Studies 37/1 (Feb. 2014), 163–4; David Stevenson, ‘Fortifications and the European Military Balance before 1914,’ Journal of Strategic Studies 35/6 (Dec. 2012), 829–59.
2. Terence M. Holmes, ‘Planning versus Chaos in Clausewitz’s On War,’ Journal of Strategic Studies 30/1 (Feb. 2007), 129–51; David Kaiser, ‘Back to Clausewitz,’ Journal of Strategic Studies 32/4 (Aug. 2009), 667–85.
3. Francis J. Gavin, ‘Politics, History and the Ivory Tower – Policy Gap in the Nuclear Proliferation Debate,’ Journal of Strategic Studies 35/4 (Aug. 2012), 573–600; Scott D. Sagan and Kenneth N. Waltz, ‘Political Scientists and Historians in Search of the Bomb,’ Journal of Strategic Studies 36/1 (Feb. 2013), 143–51; Ken Young, ‘The Hydrogen Bomb, Lewis L. Strauss and the Writing of Nuclear History,’ Journal of Strategic Studies 36/6 (Dec. 2013), 815–40.
4. Gregory A. Daddis, ‘“A Better War?” – The View from the Nixon White House,’ Journal of Strategic Studies 36/3 (June 2013), 357–84; Alexander Ovodenko, ‘Visions of the Enemy from the Field and from Abroad: Revisiting CIA and Military Expectations of the Tet Offensive,’ Journal of Strategic Studies 34/1 (Feb. 2011), 119–44.
5. Dima Adamsky, ‘The 1983 Nuclear Crisis: Lessons for Deterrence Theory and Practice,’ Journal of Strategic Studies 36/1 (Feb. 2013), 4–41.