1,623
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Welfare micropublics and inequality: urban super-diversity in a time of austerity

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 2723-2742 | Received 22 Dec 2017, Accepted 30 Nov 2018, Published online: 10 Jan 2019
 

ABSTRACT

This article argues for the importance of the role of the national and local state, and of increasing socio-economic inequality for understanding urban super-diversity in a time of austerity. Using a methodology and conceptualization that avoids the methodological ethnicism and “methodological neighbourhoodism” inherent in some diversity research, we draw on quantitative analysis and ethnographically produced material from south London to ask what differences make a difference. Examining interactions in “welfare micropublics”, including maternity services, schools, and elderly social care, we show that residents and service providers, often following an “ethos of inclusion”, routinely engage with difference in encounters, allowing the potential for conviviality to emerge. We argue that only by considering diversity together with inequality, can we develop more textured and nuanced accounts of super-diverse urban areas, including a fuller understanding of the social production of difference and indifference.

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge the contribution of Rachel Humphris, Hiranthi Jayaweera, Caroline Oliver, and photographer Simon Rowe, to the research on which this article is based. We also owe thanks to the many people who took time to meet with and be interviewed by us, and to Southwark Council for facilitation of access. Finally, we thank Sarah Neal for her perceptive comments on an earlier version.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Notes

1 The wider research project also included research on social housing estates, which is not explicitly discussed here.

3 Census data offer a snapshot of the population in small geographical areas; the ONS estimated its overall coverage to be 94 per cent for England and Wales (ONS Citation2012). It is nonetheless a partial look, and in areas of high churn and with many recent immigrants, coverage is likely to be lower, with estimates for Southwark specifically at 87 per cent, see http://www.2.southwark.gov.uk/info/200223/census_2011/2723/census_2011_briefing.

4 National Childbirth Trust, a national charity, traditionally dominated by the White, middle class.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the John Fell Fund, University of Oxford (grant number 122/680).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 174.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.