936
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Blackness, biopolitics, borders: African immigration, racialization, and the limits of American exceptionalism

ORCID Icon
Pages 1527-1548 | Received 01 May 2020, Accepted 11 Mar 2021, Published online: 21 Apr 2021
 

ABSTRACT

Centreing the corporeal experiences and material significance of bodies lays bare the border as a site for social reproduction. Utilizing critical discourse analyses on three mediatized encounters – Abdi Nor Iftin, Amadou Diallo, and Ahmed Mohammed – between African immigrancy to the United States and that nation-state's surveillance of bodies discloses a key contradiction within those encounters: a mésalliance that positions Africans as an archetype of human capital and simultaneously a critical threat to the national psyche. This essay argues that African immigrants expose this contradiction, raising questions on Blackness, sexuality, identity, immigration, anti-colonialism, and the afterlife of slavery. This dynamic not only reveals how contingent U.S. citizenship can be, while also “calling the bluff” of its exceptionalism and the underlying social contract of global neoliberalism, but also grounds Blackness transnationally as a way to avoid reproducing the racialized “sorting” that occurs before, during, and after face-to-face encounters.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Notes

1 I invoke the queer in its radical political potential, not only challenging heteronormativity (Ferguson, Citation2004), but also encouraging the fluidity and movement of peoples’ sexual lives (Cohen, Citation1997). “Queer” describes a critical relationship to existing sexual and social norms, recognizing particular political, economic, and social geographies and communities that transcend space and time; it is “a regulatory ideal, an elusive construct, a dangerous component of hegemony” (Abdur-Rahman Citation2012, 5; cf. Cohen Citation1997; Cobb et al. Citation2005).

2 Foucault (Citation1980) argued that the subject is the result of social processes, and that subjectivity is produced by a system of knowledge that controls the subject's identity.

3 Legal scholar Anja Louis provided a current definition of legal subjectivity as “the ability to bear rights and responsibilities, basic equality before the law, respect and self-determination” (Citation2005, 12).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 174.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.