Abstract
Background
In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, most U.S. medical schools acutely transitioned from regimented in-person learning to highly flexible virtual asynchronous learning. This transition at our medical school provided a unique opportunity to evaluate if and how students adapted their academic and personal lives in response.
Methods
Medical students in a single class that made this transition were retrospectively provided with 24-hour diaries for three periods – one shortly before the transition, a second early in the transition, and third several months into the transition – and asked to select the academic or personal activities done in each hour. The percentage of medical students performing each activity each hour was analyzed, as was the time spent on each activity per day, and per morning, afternoon, per evening within the day.
Results
Overall study time did not change in either virtual period but shifted significantly to the morning (6 AM to 12 PM). Time spent studying in groups fell significantly during both virtual periods, concordant with a significant increase in alone study time in the early virtual period. Early in the transition to virtual learning, students replaced in-person didactics with online faculty lectures; several months later in virtual learning, they had replaced online faculty lectures with commercial products. There was no significant change in time spent on specific personal activities.
Conclusions
Consistent with extensive constraints imposed by the heavy cognitive load of a medical school curriculum, students did not significantly change their overall study time and any self-care-related activities in the transition to virtual learning. However, transitioning to virtual learning allowed our students to adapt their study strategies, i.e. reducing group study time and increasing lone studying time. Furthermore, students shifted studying time to the morning to optimize the management of the cognitive task-load they faced.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank April Apperson for critical reading of the manuscript.
Disclosure statement
The authors report no conflict of interest.
Glossary
Chronotype: Refers to the phase of entrainment of an individual, reflecting how the circadian system embeds itself into the 24-h day.
Fischer D, Lombardi DA, Marucci-Wellman H, Roenneberg T. 2017. Chronotypes in the US – Influence of age and sex. Plos One. 12(6):e0178782-e0178782. eng.
Cognitive reserve: The amount of flexibly and efficiency of cognitive resources available in the brain.
Stern Y. 2002. What is cognitive reserve? Theory and research application of the reserve concept. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society. 8(3):448-460.
Additional information
Notes on contributors
Kama Z. Guluma
K. Z. Guluma, M.D., is the Associate Dean for Admissions and Student Affairs at the UC San Diego School of Medicine.
Katharina Brandl
K. Brandl, Ph.D., is an Associate Teaching Professor at the Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences and the Pharmacology Thread Director at the UC San Diego School of Medicine.