The goal of our work was to demonstrate that the usual assumptions of isotropy and symmetry of the bidirectional reflectance factor (BRF) are not valid for a specific anisotropic ground surface. Two methods illustrating this point are presented. The first method is based on goniometer measurements, and the second method uses a Monte Carlo algorithm. The results of both methods were analysed at different wavelengths and angular configurations. For the surface studied here, they showed that the BRF was significantly asymmetric with respect to the principal plane. In the extreme case, the difference between the two sides of the principal plane reached almost 30% of the mean reflectance value.
Bidirectional reflectance of a rough anisotropic surface
Reprints and Corporate Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:
Academic Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:
If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.
Related research
People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.
Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.
Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.