320
Views
18
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Settlement location and population density estimation in rugged terrain using information derived from Landsat ETM and SRTM data

, , &
Pages 2339-2357 | Received 06 Jun 2006, Accepted 24 Apr 2007, Published online: 25 Mar 2008
 

Abstract

It is useful to have a disaggregated population database at uniform grid units in disaster situations. This study presents a method for settlement location probability and population density estimations at a 90 m resolution for northern Iraq using the Shuttle Radar Topographic Mission (SRTM) digital terrain model and Landsat Enhanced Thematic Mapper satellite imagery. A spatial model each for calculating the probability of settlement location and for estimating population density is described. A randomly selected subset of field data (equivalent to 50%) is first analysed for statistical links between settlement location probability and population density; and various biophysical features which are extracted from Landsat or SRTM data. The model is calibrated using this subset. Settlement location probability is attributed to the distance from roads and water bodies and land cover. Population density can be estimated based upon land cover and topographic features. The Landsat data are processed using a segmentation and subsequent feature–based classification approach making this method robust to seasonal variations in imagery and therefore applicable to a time series of images regardless of acquisition date. The second half of the field data is used to validate the model. Results show a reasonable estimate of population numbers (r = 0.205, p<0.001) for both rural and urban settlements. Although there is a strong overall correlation between the results of this and the LandScan model (r = 0.464, p<0.001), this method performs better than the 1 km resolution LandScan grid for settlements with fewer than 1000 people, but is less accurate for estimating population numbers in urban areas (LandScan rural r = 0.181, p<0.001; LandScan urban r = 0.303, p<0.001). The correlation between true urban population numbers is superior to that of LandScan however when the 90 m grid values are summed using a filter which corresponds to the LandScan spatial resolution (r = 0.318, p<0.001).

Acknowledgements

This project was funded by the Canada Research Chair in Earth Observation, University of Sherbrooke, Canada, and was hosted by the Institute for the Protection and Security of the Citizen at the Joint Research Centre of the European Commission, Ispra, Italy. The SRTM correction software and the satellite image atmospheric and topographic correction software were written by Wolfgang Mehl, Environment Institute at the Joint Research Centre of the European Commission, Ispra, Italy.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 689.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.