235
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Partial unmixing as a tool for single surface class detection and time series analysis

, , , &
Pages 3233-3255 | Received 15 Jan 2007, Accepted 14 May 2007, Published online: 19 May 2008
 

Abstract

In this paper we present the results of time series analysis for a coal mining region based on partial unmixing. We test the method also known as mixture tuned matched filtering on an eight image Landsat 5 TM and Landsat 7 ETM+ time series covering the period from 1987 to 2003. Common change detection methods often include the comparison of two interactively generated classification results, such as derived from Maximum Likelihood classification. These approaches often yield highly accurate results. However, disadvantages include a strong analyst bias and hardly repeatable results. For a quantitative monitoring of a single surface class' development over time they are often not recommendable. Our goal was to test an unbiased quantitative way to assess the development of coal surfaces, such as outcropping coal seams, coal storage piles, coal waste piles, and coal washery discard, within multiple date satellite imagery. Partial unmixing approaches were developed to detect one or few target materials surrounded by—or mixed with—an unknown background material. The main advantage is that only the spectral characteristics of the material of interest must be known, and the desired material can furthermore occur with subpixel coverage. Crisp pixel classificators like maximum likelihood on the other hand require knowledge of all classes. They can only map materials which dominate a pixel. Linear unmixing procedures such as partial unmixing require a thorough radiometric pre‐processing of data. Furthermore, the accuracy and representativity of selected input spectra must be granted. In this paper we demonstrate that partial unmixing is a powerful method to detect and extract single landcover classes of interest relatively fast and unbiased. The subpixel fraction percentages should be interpreted in a relative way only. We furthermore show that partial unmixing represents a standardized method for time series analyses and allows for a quantitative assessment of the temporal development of an area. Challenges lie in the validation of partial unmixing results, which we realized through thresholding of unmixing results and accuracy assessment with ground truth polygons mapped in situ. Furthermore, we performed an indirect comparison with results of a multi‐endmember unmixing.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Dr. Jianzhong Zhang, Dr. Paul van Dijk and Dr. Zhang Xiangmin for supporting the collection of field spectra during the 2002 field campaign. Further thanks go to David Moerth for help with the processing of data.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 689.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.