480
Views
60
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

A comparison of two spectral mixture modelling approaches for impervious surface mapping in urban areas

, &
Pages 4785-4806 | Received 23 Mar 2007, Accepted 31 Jan 2008, Published online: 07 Sep 2009
 

Abstract

Urban change processes that have been occurring over the past decades are affecting the human and natural environment in many ways, and have stressed the need for new, more effective urban management approaches. In this context, mapping man-made impervious surfaces has been the focus of attention as impervious surfaces can be used as a general indicator to quantify urban change and its environmental impact. Despite the currently available digital imagery from high-resolution satellite sensors such as Ikonos and Quickbird, or from airborne cameras, spectral unmixing approaches applied on medium-resolution data from sensors such as Landsat Thematic Mapper (TM)/Enhanced TM Plus (ETM+) or Systėme Probatoire d' Observation de la Terre-Haute Résolution Visible (SPOT-HRV) offer interesting perspectives to map impervious surfaces for large spatial extents. Several techniques for subpixel impervious surface mapping have been examined previously but there is a lack of comparative analysis. Our objective was to compare two spectral mixture analysis (SMA) models: the linear spectral unmixing model and the multilayer perceptron (MLP) model. Both models were implemented in a multiresolution framework, where reference data for model training were obtained from a high-resolution land-cover classification (derived from Ikonos imagery), while the models themselves were applied on medium-resolution data (Landsat ETM+). As a secondary objective, the effect of spectral normalization on the performance of both models was assessed. The MLP model clearly performed better than the linear mixture model. The average absolute error of the impervious surface proportion estimate within each medium-resolution pixel was 10.4% for the MLP model versus 12.9% for the linear mixture model. Spectral normalization was used to improve the results obtained by the linear mixture model, with the mean absolute error (MAE) for impervious surfaces decreasing from 14.8% to 12.9% after normalization. Its effects on the MLP model appeared to be insignificant. The outcome of this study can help to provide guidance for the selection of an approach to estimate continuous impervious surface fractions from medium-resolution data.

Acknowledgements

Belgian Science Policy and the Institute for the Promotion of Innovation through Science and Technology in Flanders (IWT-Vlaanderen) are gratefully acknowledged for providing the funds for this research. We also thank the anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 689.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.