Does spatial resolution matter? A multi-scale comparison of object-based and pixel-based methods for detecting change associated with gas well drilling operations

Abstract

An implicit assumption of the geographic object-based image analysis (GEOBIA) literature is that GEOBIA is more accurate than pixel-based methods for high spatial resolution image classification, but that the benefits of using GEOBIA are likely to be lower when moderate resolution data are employed. This study investigates this assumption within the context of a case study of mapping forest clearings associated with drilling for natural gas. The forest clearings varied from 0.2 to 9.2 ha, with an average size of 0.9 ha. National Aerial Imagery Program data from 2004 to 2010, with 1 m pixel size, were resampled through pixel aggregation to generate imagery with 2, 5, 15, and 30 m pixel sizes. The imagery for each date and at each of the five spatial resolutions was classified into Forest and Non-forest classes, using both maximum likelihood and GEOBIA. Change maps were generated through overlay of the classified images. Accuracy evaluation was carried out using a random sampling approach. The 1 m GEOBIA classification was found to be significantly more accurate than the GEOBIA and per-pixel classifications with either 15 or 30 m resolution. However, at any one particular pixel size (e.g. 1 m), the pixel-based classification was not statistically different from the GEOBIA classification. In addition, for the specific class of forest clearings, accuracy varied with the spatial resolution of the imagery. As the pixel size coarsened from 1 to 30 m, accuracy for the per-pixel method increased from 59% to 80%, but decreased from 71% to 58% for the GEOBIA classification. In summary, for studying the impact of forest clearing associated with gas extraction, GEOBIA is more accurate than pixel-based methods, but only at the very finest resolution of 1 m. For coarser spatial resolutions, per-pixel methods are not statistically different from GEOBIA.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the two anonymous reviewers for their important insights, which improved this article. West Virginia View provided support for this research.

Notes