On the net surface water exchange rate estimated from remote-sensing observation and reanalysis

Abstract

This study compares the net surface water exchange rates, or surface precipitation (P) minus evapotranspiration (ET), and atmospheric water vapour sinks calculated from various observations and reanalyses, and investigates whether they are physically consistent. We use the observed precipitation from the Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP) and the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) 3B43, ocean evaporation from Goddard Satellite-based Surface Turbulent Fluxes Version 2c (GSSTF2c), and land ET from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) global ET project (MOD16) and PT-JPL products to calculate observed P minus observed ET. P–ET is also obtained from atmospheric water vapour sink calculated using Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS)/Advanced Microwave Sounding Unit observation specific humidity observation and wind fields from the Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications (MERRA) and ERA-interim, denoted as AIRS_M and AIRS_E, respectively. MERRA and ERA-interim water vapour budgets are also calculated for cross-comparison and consistency check. The period of study is between 2003 and 2006 based on the availability of all of the data sets. Averaged water vapour sinks from AIRS and reanalysis are consistent over the global ocean and are close to zero (range: 0.02–0.06 mm day⁻¹), but range between 0.14 and 0.23 mm day⁻¹ when land is included. Over ocean within 50^oS--50^oN, averaged observed P minus observed evaporation shows a much larger negative number than that obtained from AIRS and reanalysis. The differences mainly occur over subtropical oceans, especially in the southern hemisphere in summer and the northern hemisphere in winter. Over land, generally higher agreement between observed P minus observed ET and atmospheric water vapour sinks (calculated from AIRS and reanalysis) is found. However, large regional differences, often with strong seasonal dependence, are also observed over land. Estimates of atmospheric water vapour sinks are influenced by both winds and biases in water vapour data, especially over tropics and subtropical oceans, thereby calling for the need for further investigations and consistency checks of satellite-based and reanalysis water vapour, reanalysis winds, P observations, and surface evaporation estimates. In higher latitudes, atmospheric water vapour sinks calculated from AIRS_M, AIRS_E, MERRA, and ERA-interim are more consistent with each other.

Acknowledgements

The research described in this article was carried out at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under a contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

Funding

This study was supported by the JPL AIRS project and a contract with NASA. Funding to JBF was provided by NASA’s Terrestrial Hydrology Program. Government sponsorship is acknowledged.