247
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Assessing the impacts of human uncertainty in the accuracy assessment of land-cover maps using linguistic scales and fuzzy intervals

, ORCID Icon, , &
Pages 2524-2547 | Received 25 Oct 2014, Accepted 12 Mar 2015, Published online: 12 May 2015
 

Abstract

The accuracy assessment of land-cover maps requires reference databases which are intended to represent ground truth. However, these reference databases are usually obtained through photo-interpretation of aerial or very-high-resolution satellite images and therefore have uncertainty which will influence the results of the accuracy assessment. Previous efforts to account for this source of uncertainty have employed a linguistic scale to translate the degree of correspondence between the ground conditions and each land-cover class for each sample location. The linguistic scale is transformed into fuzzy intervals with this transformation based on a photo-interpreter’s hypothetical ideal perception of the land-cover areal coverage for a sample unit. The end result is a fuzzy accuracy assessment. The objectives of this article are to assess the degree to which the real response of photo-interpreters corresponds to the assumed ideal response and to evaluate the impact these differences have on the results of an accuracy assessment. To achieve this objective, we examine linguistic scales with five and seven values. Furthermore, we develop a method to transform these scales into interpreter-derived fuzzy intervals expressing the proportion of area of land cover for each sample unit. This transformation is accomplished using a control sample in which the area occupied by each land-cover class is assessed. The methodology is tested via a case study where a map with five land-cover classes is evaluated. The accuracy assessment is performed with both hypothetical ideal interpreter response and with the interpreter-derived fuzzy intervals. The results for the fuzzy accuracy measures produced from the different analyses show that there are considerable differences between the results obtained with the linguistic scale with five and seven values, and that the interpreter-derived seven-value linguistic scale provides results very similar to those obtained with the ideal interpreter response.

ORCID

Cidália C. Fonte http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9408-8100

Additional information

Funding

Research by Pedro Sarmento was funded by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology [SFRH/BD/61900/2009]. This work has been partially supported by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology under project grant[s] [PEst-C/ EEI/UI308/2011]. Research by Cidália Fonte was partially supported by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology under project grant [PEst-C/EEI/UI0308/-2011]. S. Stehman was partially funded by [NNX13AP48G].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 689.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.