248
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Anthropogenic aerosol fraction over the Indian region: model simulations versus multi-satellite data analysis

, , &
Pages 782-804 | Received 15 Mar 2015, Accepted 20 Dec 2015, Published online: 05 Feb 2016
 

ABSTRACT

Anthropogenic aerosols play a crucial role in our environment, climate, and health. Assessment of spatial and temporal variation in anthropogenic aerosols is essential to determine their impact. Aerosols are of natural and anthropogenic origin and together constitute a composite aerosol system. Information about either component needs elimination of the other from the composite aerosol system. In the present work we estimated the anthropogenic aerosol fraction (AF) over the Indian region following two different approaches and inter-compared the estimates. We espouse multi-satellite data analysis and model simulations (using the CHIMERE Chemical transport model) to derive natural aerosol distribution, which was subsequently used to estimate AF over the Indian subcontinent. These two approaches are significantly different from each other. Natural aerosol satellite-derived information was extracted in terms of optical depth while model simulations yielded mass concentration. Anthropogenic aerosol fraction distribution was studied over two periods in 2008: pre-monsoon (March–May) and winter (November–February) in regard to the known distinct seasonality in aerosol loading and type over the Indian region. Although both techniques have derived the same property, considerable differences were noted in temporal and spatial distribution. Satellite retrieval of AF showed maximum values during the pre-monsoon and summer months while lowest values were observed in winter. On the other hand, model simulations showed the highest concentration of AF in winter and the lowest during pre-monsoon and summer months. Both techniques provided an annual average AF of comparable magnitude (~0.43 ± 0.06 from the satellite and ~0.48 ± 0.19 from the model). For winter months the model-estimated AF was ~0.62 ± 0.09, significantly higher than that (0.39 ± 0.05) estimated from the satellite, while during pre-monsoon months satellite-estimated AF was ~0.46 ± 0.06 and the model simulation estimation ~0.53 ± 0.14. Preliminary results from this work indicate that model-simulated results are nearer to the actual variation as compared to satellite estimation in view of general seasonal variation in aerosol concentrations.

Acknowledgements

Authors thank the ARFI project of ISRO-GBP for their support. The authors thank B.N. Holben, NASA GSFC for providing AERONET data from Kanpur, Nainital, Visakhapatnam, and Gandhi College; and the site PI and staff for their efforts in establishing and maintaining the AERONET sites.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 689.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.