565
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Effects of sediments and coloured dissolved organic matter on remote sensing of chlorophyll-a using Landsat TM/ETM+ over turbid waters

, , &
Pages 1421-1440 | Received 19 Apr 2017, Accepted 07 Nov 2017, Published online: 27 Nov 2017
 

ABSTRACT

Remote sensing of chlorophyll-a is challenging in water containing inorganic suspended sediments (i.e. non-volatile suspended solids, NVSS) and coloured dissolved organic matter (CDOM). The effects of NVSS and CDOM on empirical remote-sensing estimates of chlorophyll-a in inland waters have not been determined on a broad spatial and temporal scale. This study evaluated these effects using a long-term (1989–2012) data set that included chlorophyll-a, NVSS, and CDOM from 39 reservoirs across Missouri (USA). Model comparisons indicated that the machine-learning algorithm BRT (boosted regression trees, validation Nash–Sutcliffe coefficient = 0.350) was better than linear regression (validation Nash–Sutcliffe coefficient = 0.214) for chlorophyll-a estimate using Landsat Thematic Mapper (TM) and Enhanced Thematic Mapper Plus (ETM+) imagery. Only a small proportion of BRT model residuals could be explained by sediments or CDOM, and the observed trends in BRT residuals were different from the theoretical effects expected from NVSS and CDOM. Our results also indicated a small systematic bias by the BRT model, but it was not likely caused by NVSS or CDOM.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), USA: [Grant Number R835203]. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of US EPA, or any other agency of the US government. We thank Dr David W. Hyndman and Dr Stephen K. Hamilton for reviewing this manuscript and providing useful comments. We also appreciate the comments from the anonymous reviewers of this journal.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), USA: [Grant Number R835203].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 689.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.