977
Views
42
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Comparisons of three recent moderate resolution African land cover datasets: CGLS-LC100, ESA-S2-LC20, and FROM-GLC-Africa30

, ORCID Icon, , , , , ORCID Icon & show all
Pages 6185-6202 | Received 29 Apr 2018, Accepted 16 Feb 2019, Published online: 05 Mar 2019
 

ABSTRACT

Accurate and up-to-date land use land cover (LULC) mapping has long been a challenge in Africa. Recently, three LULC maps with moderate spatial resolution (20 m to 100 m) have been developed using multiple Earth observation datasets for 2015–2016 for the whole continent, which provide unprecedented spatial detail of the land surface for Africa. This study aimed to compare these three recent African LULC maps (i.e. the Copernicus Global Land Service Land Cover (CGLS-LC100, 100 m), European Space Agency Sentinel-2A Land Cover (ESA-S2-LC20, 20 m) and Finer Resolution Observation and Monitoring of Global Land Cover for Africa version 2 (FROM-GLC-Africa30, 30 m)) using a validation sample set and statistics from the FAO. The results indicated that the accuracy of the three datasets was unevenly distributed in spatial extent and area estimation. All the three datasets achieve an accuracy of above 60% and the fraction layer of CGLS-LC100 showed the best consistency with FAO statistics in the area. However, great disagreement in spatial details was found among three products, with 43.12% of the total area in Africa was in low agreement. The LULC mapping regions with the highest uncertainty were southeast Africa, the Sahel region and the Eastern Africa Plateau. Uncertainty was most closely related to elevation and precipitation changes along latitude/longitude.

Acknowledgments

This work was partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant number: 41661144022], the research grant from Tsinghua University [grant number: 20151080351] and the Youth Innovation Promotion Association, Chinese Academy of Sciences (grant number: Y4YR1300QM).

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [41661144022];Tsinghua University [20151080351];Youth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [Y4YR1300QM];

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 689.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.