189
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Spectral discrimination using infinite leaf reflectance and simulated canopy reflectance

Pages 3039-3055 | Received 28 Sep 2020, Accepted 20 Nov 2020, Published online: 20 Jan 2021
 

ABSTRACT

An important application of hyperspectral remote sensing is monitoring the diversity of plant species and functional types, which correlate with differences of leaf chemical constituents. Diffuse reflectance of an infinitely thick leaf (R) is directly related to chemical absorbance and may be calculated from leaf spectral reflectance and transmittance based on Kubelka-Munk theory or other radiative transfer models. The PROSPECT-D leaf optics model was used to create leaf optical properties of nine pseudo-species, and R were calculated using Stokes’, Lillesaeter’s, Goudriaan’s, and Hapke’s equations. Conceptually, R is assumed to equal canopy reflectance (canopy ρ) at maximum leaf area index. For each pseudo-species, canopy ρ at a leaf area index of 10 was obtained using the PROSAIL model, but the simulated canopy ρ did not match R. Similarity between R and canopy ρ for each pseudo-species was calculated using five spectral information metrics: Euclidean distance (ED), an adjusted spectral correlation measure (SCM), spectral angle mapper (SAM), spectral information divergence (SID), and the product of SID × sin(SAM). Differences using ED between canopy ρ and R were large, especially using Stokes’ equation. However, the SCM, SAM, SID, and SID × sin(SAM) metrics showed R from the Stokes’ equation was the most similar to canopy ρ, because these metrics are insensitive to differences in magnitude. The combined SID × sin(SAM) metric had the greatest similarity between R and canopy ρ compared to the other spectral information metrics. While R was not a good substitute for canopy ρ, R may be important for assessing differences of leaf chemical composition among species, thereby avoiding effects of taxon-independent factors on canopy ρ.

Acknowledgements

I thank Dr Craig S. T. Daughtry for discussions and Mr Shawn P. Opperman for computer programming.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 689.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.