ABSTRACT
Using remote sensing technology for exploring the trait of interest can provide better results without damaging the plants and are comparatively economic. Traditional methods are available for quantification of different pigments and chemicals present in plants, yet these methods do not allow repeated measurements on the same plant throughout development. The reflected values from plant surfaces are a direct representation of plant physiology including plant morphological factors. The hyperspectral imaging indices for vegetation and water-stressed canopies provided a better indication of each genotype proficiency, thus improving their selection efficiency. The presence of epicuticular wax (EW) influences the reflectance from leaf surface which depends on the presence of leaf pigments including carotenoids, photosynthetic light use efficiency biochemical structures, and water content as they absorb the incident light necessary for photosynthesis. The results obtained suggested decrease carotenoid reflectance index (CRI) and photochemical reflectance index (PRI) values for high wax lines indicating the low concentration of stress-related pigments thus improving plant health and extended maturation. The high waxy lines decreased for plant senescence reflectance index (PSRI) and reduce canopy stress at grain filling and maturation growth stages. A positive correlation between high epicuticular wax (EW) and yield was found confirming previous study. A positive correlation between high epicuticular wax (EW) lines and yield indicated its important role in preventing yield losses under drought conditions.
Nomenclature
ASD | = | Analytical spectral devices |
CRI | = | Carotenoids reflectance index |
CS | = | College Station |
EMS | = | Ethyl methanesulfonate |
EW | = | Epicuticular wax |
GNDVI | = | Green normalized difference vegetation index |
HW | = | High wax |
LW | = | Low wax |
NDVI | = | Normalized difference vegetation index |
NIR | = | Near infrared |
PAR | = | Photo synthetically active region |
PRI | = | Photo reflectance index |
PSRI | = | Plant senescence reflectance index |
RCBD | = | Randomized complete block design |
RILs | = | Recombinant inbred lines |
SRI | = | Spectral reflectance indices |
WL | = | Wax load |
WBI | = | Water band index |
Acknowledgements
First and foremost, I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my advisor Prof. Dr. Dirk B. Hays for the continuous support of my Master study and research for his patience, motivation, and immense knowledge. My sincere thanks also go to Dr. Chenghai Yang for collecting hyperspectral imagery for this project and offering his timely help and advice whenever needed. I thank my lab colleagues especially Mr. Henry Awika for the stimulating discussions.
Availability of supporting data
The data sets used for calculation and final statistics are available in this article and more details can be shared with the reviewers on demand.
Consent for publication
Not applicable
Disclosure statement
Not applicable
Contributors and Funding Sources
I would like to thank my lab colleagues for their generous support and help throughout my research and contributing to finishing up this project. I would also extend my sincere and special thanks to my committee members for always being there to help and guide. Dr. Chenghai Yang from USDA-ARS College Station provided the hyperspectral imagery obtained from College Station. All the other research was conducted at the Department of Soil & Crop Sciences, Texas A&M University. The funding for this project was supported by the Agricultural innovation program (AIP) for Pakistan funded by the USAID, CIMMYT international Maize and Wheat Improvement Center and the University of California Davis. The Pakistan Agriculture Research Centre (PARC) was involved as both hosting partner as well as leading this project.
Ethical Approval and Consent to participate
Not applicable