628
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Multi-platform LiDAR approach for detecting coarse woody debris in a landscape with varied ground cover

, , , , , & show all
Pages 9324-9350 | Received 29 Apr 2021, Accepted 13 Oct 2021, Published online: 06 Nov 2021
 

ABSTRACT

Coarse woody debris (CWD), or fallen logs, is known to be an essential habitat element for many organisms. CWD also supports ecosystem functioning through soil formation, nutrient cycling, and carbon storage. For these reasons, accurate assessments of CWD across landscapes are of interest to many ecologists and landscape managers, but traditional field-based measurements can be time-consuming and sampling strategies may not be representative of entire landscapes. Light detection and ranging (LiDAR) technologies may be able to provide a more rapid assessment of the number and volume of CWD across wide areas. However, most research using LiDAR for forest and woodland inventory assessment has focused on standing wood. Detection accuracy of CWD with LiDAR can be impacted by the point density of LiDAR data, ground layer vegetation, and sensor positioning relative to other vegetation or landscape structural features. We used a high-resolution terrestrial laser scanner (TLS), an unoccupied aerial vehicle (UAV) laser scanner (ULS), and a combination of data from both sensors (i.e. fused data, FLS) to estimate CWD in a grassy woodland ecosystem. The study area comprised plots with different types and amounts of vegetation cover and different types of CWD, both naturally occurring and introduced including dispersed, clumped, or a mixture of both types. This enabled a more detailed exploration of model performance across sensor types, vegetation types, and ground cover biomass. A random forest (RF) classification algorithm and noise removing operations on raster imagery were used to classify CWD. Completeness and correctness accuracy with the developed method were highly variable depending on the data and ground vegetation cover and ranged between 20% and 86%, and 12% and 96%, respectively, in comparison with field data. The LiDAR-derived digital surface model (DSM), surface roughness, and topographic position index were important variables for CWD detection. We found that the detection accuracy of CWD varied with the vegetation type, amount of ground vegetation cover, and LiDAR data. Ground cover density had a strong negative impact on accuracy, particularly for TLS and FLS data.

Acknowledgements

We thank Paul Yeoh, Evelyn Wu, Renee Stainer, and Phoebe Hopkins for their help with data collection. This research was funded by a grant from the Australian Research Council (DE150101870) and The Australian National University Centre for Biodiversity Analysis Ignition Grant.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 689.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.