Fighting words: naming terrorists, bandits, rebels and other violent actors

Abstract

This introductory paper identifies some of the core background themes and theories through which the ‘politics of naming’ and other forms of discourse conflict can be examined. The focus is on the nature, power, role and function of names, with a final section examining the ethics of naming and examining terrorism. The central unifying theme is the contested relationship between the actual nature of a movement and the name applied, particularly in terms of the attempt to identify the essence or true nature of a movement and how this relates to other dissenting or surrounding factors. Once assigned, the power of a name is such that the process by which the name was selected generally disappears and a series of normative associations, motives and characteristics are attached to the named subject. Indeed, the long historical relationship between the naming of opponents, empire and colonialism, as well as the manner in which the global media frame armed conflict, only provide further reason to doubt the truthfulness of the names assigned, and their ability to address the micro-realities involved in these conflicts and movements.

Notes

The author would like to thank Shahid Qadir, Thomas Rath, Stina Torjesen, Anthony McDermott, Nicole Evans and Andrew March for their assistance and advice. Dr Michael Schroeder generously provided the title for this article.

‘Philippines: Moro spokesman warns terrorist tag will result in “bloodier war”’, bbc Monitoring International Reports, 15 May 2003.

‘Text of Bush, Arroyo remarks,’ Associated Press, Washington, DC, 19 May 2003.

See TM McKenna, Muslim Rulers and Rebels: Everyday Politics and Armed Separatism in the Southern Philippines, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1998; and S Miller, Benevolent Assimilation: The American Conquest of the Philippines, 1899 – 1903, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1984.

Afghanistan ngo Security Organization (anso), ‘Incident report: insurgent propaganda’, 18 April 2004.

‘Khamene'i says US uses war against terror as excuse to attack Islam’, bbc Monitoring International Reports, 24 December 2003.

anso, ‘Incident report’.

‘Weekender’, BusinessWorld (Philippines), 4 July 2003; and D Riechmann, ‘Philippine president to use state visit to seek aid, military assistance to fight terrorists', Associated Press, 18 May 2003.

MK Adler, Naming and Addressing: A Sociolinguistic Study, Hamburg: Helmut Buske, 1978, pp 12, 93 – 94.

YF Khong, Analogies at War: Korea, Munich, Dien Bien Phu and the Vietnam Decisions of 1965, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1992, pp 10, 13.

Plato, Cratylus, trans HN Fowler, London: William Heinemann, 1953, pp 151, 185 (line 439). For further examination of the ‘normative’ aspect of Cratylus, see R Barney, Names and Nature in Plato's Cratylus, London: Routledge, 2001, p 4.

T Parsons, ‘An approach to the sociology of knowledge’, Transactions of the Fourth World Congress of Sociology, Milan, 1959, pp 25 – 49, as cited in C Geertz, The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays, New York: Basic Books, 2000, p 195.

D Spender, ‘The politics of naming’, in M Curtis (ed), The Composition of Ourselves, Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt, 2000, p 195.

J Hertzler, A Sociology of Language, New York: Random House, 1965, p 268ff, as cited in Adler, Naming and Addressing, p 12.

R Barthes, ‘Introduction to the structural analysis of narratives’, in Barthes, Image-Music-Text, trans S Heath, Glasgow: Fontana, 1977, p 116. See also MJ Shapiro, The Politics of Representation: Writing Practices in Biography, Photography, and Policy Analysis, Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, 1988, p xii.

H Arendt, The Life of the Mind, New York: Harcourt, Brace and Jovanovich, 1978, p 102, as quoted in K Hicks, ‘Metaphors we kill by: the legacy of US antiterrorist rhetoric’, The Political Chronicle, Fall/Winter 1991, pp 21 – 29.

K Allan & K Burridge, Euphemism and Dysphemism: Language Used as Shield and Weapon, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991, p 3.

M Shaw, Civil Society and Media in Global Crises: Representing Distant Violence, London: Pinter, 1996, p 179.

K Hall-Jamieson & P Waldman, The Press Effect: Politicians, Journalists and the Stories that Shape the Political World, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003, pp xiii – xiv, 1.

KA Cerulo, Deciphering Violence: The Cognitive Structure of Right and Wrong, New York: Routledge, 1998, p 3.

JJ Sadkovich, The US Media and Yugoslavia, 1991 – 1995, Westport, CT: Praeger, 1998, p 6. See also T Allen & J Seaton (eds), The Media of Conflict: War Reporting and Representations of Ethnic Violence, London: Zed Books, 1999.

SL Carruthers, The Media At War: Communication and Conflict in the Twentieth Century, London: Macmillan, 2000, pp 15, 28.

W von Oven, Mit Goebbels bis zum Ende, Vol 1, Finale Furioso, 1974, pp 285, as cited in M Balfour, Propaganda in War: Organisation, Policies and Publics in Britain and Germany, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1979, p 431.

For the complaints, see D Pipes, ‘They're terrorists—not activists’, New York Sun, 7 September 2004.

Shaw, Civil Society and Media in Global Crises, p 12.

B Bender, ‘Revamp urged for USA's psyops program’, Jane's Defense Weekly, 11 October 2000.

JF Metzl, ‘Rwandan genocide and the international law of radio jamming’, American Journal of International Law, 91 (4), October 1997, p 62.

S/RES/837 (6 June 1993); and Report of the Secretary-General on the Implementation of Security Council Resolution 837 (1993).

RW Rieber (ed), The Psychology of War and Peace: The Image of the Enemy, New York: Plenum Press, 1991, p 7.

D Campbell, Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity, Manchester University Press, 1998, pp 3, 73.

D Scott, ‘Colonial governmentality’, Social Text, 43, 1995; and RL Doty, Imperial Encounters: The Political Representation in North – South Relations, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1996, p 4.

‘If cultural and psychological divisions between “us” and the “orientals” do not hold fast, imperialism loses its moral justification as a civilizing mission.’ J Ruskin, The Mythology of Imperialism, New York: Random House, 1971, as cited in S Layton, Russian Literature and Empire: Conquest of the Caucasus from Pushkin to Tolstoy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994, p 10.

L Malkki, ‘National geographic: the rooting of peoples and the territorialization of national identity among scholars and refugees’, Cultural Antrhropology, 7 (1), 1992, pp 24 – 44.

G Ó Tuathail & TW Luke, ‘Present at the (dis)integration: deterritorialization and reterritorialization in the New Wor(l)d Order’, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 84 (3), 1994, pp 394 – 395. See also E Keene, Beyond the Anarchical Society: Grotius, Colonialism and Order in World Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002; and F Debrix, Re-Envisioning Peacekeeping: The United Nations and the Mobilization of Ideology, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1999.

M Ignatieff, The Warrior's Honor: Ethnic War and the Modern Conscience, New York: Metropolitan Books, 1997, p 80.

‘Ethnic stereotypes, ancient and modern, though revealing almost nothing about the groups they are intended to define, say a great deal about the community which produces them.’ E Hall, Inventing the Barbarian: Greek Self-Definition Through Tragedy, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991, pp 2, 9, 10.

MB Salter, Barbarians and Civilization in International Relations, London: Pluto Press, 2002, p 4. See also C Weber, Simulating Sovereignty: Intervention, the State, and Symbolic Exchange, Cambridge University Press, 1995, p 5.

R Clutterbuck, The Media and Political Violence, London: Macmillan, 1981, p 90.

Amnesty International, Annual Report 2003, May 2003. See also R Foot, ‘Human rights and counter-terrorism in America's Asia policy’, Adelphi Paper, 363 (1), 2003.

S Zizek, ‘Are we in a war? Do we have an enemy?’, London Review of Books, 24 (10), 23 May 2002. See also V Harle, The Enemy with a Thousand Faces, London: Praeger, 2000, p 75.

R Scott, ‘An “official” Islamic response to the Egyptian al-jihad movement’, Journal of Political Ideologies, 8 (1), 2003, p 44.

See MV Bhatia, ‘Enlightened interventions? The discourse of tactics in military occupation and contemporary transitional administration’ (under revision).

J Van Doorn, The Soldier and Social Change, London: Sage Publications, 1975, p 103.

D Riches, ‘The phenomenon of violence’, in Riches (ed), The Anthropology of Violence, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1986, p 7.

For Rome, see RB Asprey, War in the Shadows: The Guerrilla in History, New York: William Morrow, 1994, p 9; for Spain, see Karma Nabulsi, Traditions of War: Occupation, Resistance and the Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999, pp 29 – 30.

P Schlesinger, Media, State and Nation: Political Violence and Collective Identities, London: Sage Publications, 1991.

CS Gray, Modern Strategy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999, p 285.

WE Connolly, ‘Preface to the Third Edition’, in Connolly, The Terms of Political Discourse, Oxford: Blackwell, 1997, p xi.

J Friedrichs, ‘Defining the international public enemy: the political struggle behind the legal debate on international terrorism’, paper presented at the Fifth Pan-European International Relations Conference, The Hague, The Netherlands, 9 – 11 September 2004. See also Geoffrey Nunberg, ‘How much wallop can a single word pack?’, New York Times, 11 July 2004.

J Mariner, ‘Trivializing terrorism’, Writ, 13 May 2004, at http://writ.news.findlaw.com/mariner/. See also Mariner, ‘Good and bad terrorism’, 7 January 2002; and Mariner, ‘Our many and varied wars against terror’, 21 January 2002.

Balfour, Propaganda in War, pp 421 – 423.

G McFarlane, ‘Violence in rural Northern Ireland: social scientific models, folk explanations and local variation’, in Riches, The Anthropology of Violence, p 188; and D Campbell, National Deconstruction: Violence, Identity and Justice in Bosnia, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1998, p 55.

‘Statesman’, in Plato: Complete Works, ed J Cooper, Indianapolis, 1997, 262d1 – 6, as cited in Barney, Names and Nature in Plato's Cratylus, p 9.

See D Pipes, ‘Jihad and the professors’, Commentary, November 2002.

J Der Derian, ‘In terrorem: before and after 9/11’, in K Booth & T Dunne (eds), Worlds in Collision: Terror and the Future of Global Order, London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2002, p 102, as quoted in M Zehfuss, ‘Forget September 11’, Third World Quarterly, 24 (3), 2003, pp 513 – 528.

D Brooks, ‘Cult of death’, New York Times, 7 September 2004.

M Foucault, ‘The order of discourse’, in M J Shapiro (ed), Language and Politics, New York: New York University Press, 1984, p 127.

P Termes, The Just War: An American Reflection on the Morality of War in Our Time, Chicago, IL: Ivan R Dee, 2003, pp 149, 179.

Connolly, ‘Preface to the third edition’, p xi; and MJ Shapiro, Violent Cartographies: Mapping Cultures of War, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1997, p 31.