Pro-poor Tourism: a critique

Abstract

Tourism's role as a development tool has increased over the past three decades. Its contribution to poverty alleviation was first noted in the 1970s, but this focus was increasingly blurred in theoretical debates over ‘development’ in the 1980s and 1990s. It resurfaced at the end of the 1990s with the emergence of ‘pro-poor tourism’ (ppt), defined as tourism which brings net benefits to the poor. In this paper the emergence of ppt is described, its main features outlined, and several conceptual and substantive criticisms are discussed. It is concluded that, while ppt is based on a worthwhile injunction to help the poor, it is distinctive neither theoretically nor in its methods, and has become too closely associated with community-based tourism. Rather than remain on the academic and development margins, it should be reintegrated into and reinform mainstream studies of tourism and development, and focus more on researching the actual and potential role of mass tourism in alleviating poverty and bringing ‘development’.

Notes

1 K Willis, Theories and Practices of Development, London: Routledge, 2005.

2 D Seers, ‘The meaning of development’, International Development Review, 11 (4), 1969, pp 2–6; and Seers, ‘The new meaning of development’, International Development Review, 19 (3), 1977, pp 2–7.

3 A Leftwich, States of Development: On the Primacy of Politics in Development, Cambridge: Polity Press, 2000; and Willis, Theories and Practices of Development, pp 93–96.

4 Report of the Independent Commission on International Development, North–South: A Programme for Survival (The Brandt Report), London: Pan Books, 1980, p 282; and World Commission on Environment and Development, Our Comment Future, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987, pp 3, 8.

5 DE Hawkins & S Mann, ‘The World Bank's role in tourism development’, Annals of Tourism Research, 34 (2), 2007, pp 348–363.

6 Asian Development Bank (adb), Regional Technical Assistance 5893: Mekong/Lancang River Tourism Infrastructure Development Project, Manila: adb, 1999; and adb, Building on Success: A Strategic Framework for the Next Ten Years of the Greater Mekong Subregion Economic Cooperation Program, Manila: adb, 2002.

7 M Mowforth & I Munt, Tourism and Sustainability: Development and New Tourism in the Third World, London: Routledge, 2003, p 263.

8 E de Kadt (ed), Tourism: Passport to Development?, New York: Oxford University Press, for the World Bank and unesco, 1979.

9 Ibid, p xii.

10 VL Smith (ed), Hosts and Guests: The Anthropology of Tourism, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1978.

11 D Harrison, ‘Towards developing a framework for analysing tourism phenomena: a discussion’, Current Issues in Tourism, 10 (1), pp 61–63.

12 E Rodenburg, ‘The effects of scale in economic development: tourism in Bali, Annals of Tourism Research, 7 (2), 1980, pp 177–196; and D Telfer, ‘The evolution of tourism and development theory’, in R Sharpley & DJ Telfer (eds), Tourism and Development: Concepts and Issues, Clevedon: Channel View Publications, 2002, pp 58–60.

13 D Harrison & S Schipani, ‘Lao tourism and poverty alleviation: community-based tourism and the private sector’, Current Issues in Tourism, 10 (2–3), 2007, p 196.

14 H Goodwin, ‘Pro-poor tourism: principles, methodologies and mainstreaming’, keynote address to the international conference on ‘Pro-poor Tourism: Mechanisms and Mainstreaming’, Universiti Teknologi, Malaysia, 4–6 May 2005; D Roe, ‘How pro-poor is tourism?’, id21 insights, 62, Brighton: Institute of Development Studies, 2006; Harrison & Shipani, ‘Lao tourism and poverty alleviation’, pp 196–198; and R Scheyvens, ‘Exploring the tourism–poverty nexus’, Current Issues in Tourism, 10 (2–3), 2007, pp 235–236.

15 Department for International Development (dfid), Tourism and Poverty Elimination: Untapped Potential, London: dfid, 1999, p 1.

16 C Ashley, ‘Pro-poor tourism: putting poverty at the heart of the tourism agenda’, Paper 51, London: Overseas Development Institute, 2000; C Ashley, D Roe & H Goodwin, Pro-poor Tourism Strategies: Making Tourism Work for the Poor—A Review of Experience, London: Overseas Development Institute, International Institute for Responsible Tourism and Centre for Responsible Tourism, 2001; Pro-poor Tourism Partnership, at www.propoortourism.org.uk/ppt_pubs, 2007, accessed 19 November 2007; and Overseas Development Institute, at www.odi.org.uk/tourism/projects/index.

17 World Tourism Organization (wto), Tourism and Poverty Alleviation, Madrid: wto, 2002, p 93.

18 United Nations World Tourism Organisation (unwto), st-ep, at www.unwto.org/step/index, accessed 19 November 2007.

19 J Denman & R Denman, Tourism and Poverty Alleviation: Recommendations for Action, Madrid: wto, 2004.

20 W Jamieson, Poverty Alleviation through Sustainable Tourism Development, Bangkok: escap, 2003.

21 Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (escap), ‘The contribution of tourism to poverty alleviation’, escap Tourism Review, 25, Bangkok: escap, 2005.

22 W Jamieson, H Goodwin & C Edmunds, ‘Contribution of tourism to poverty alleviation: pro-poor tourism and the challenge of measuring impacts’, report prepared for the Transport Policy and Tourism Section, Transport and Tourism Division, escap, November 2004.

23 See, for example, V Gerosa, Tourism: A Viable Option for Pro-poor Growth in Africa?, Expert Group Meeting, Munyonyo Speke Resort, Kampala, 23–24 June 2003.

24 A Rossetto, T Sofield & FMS Li, ‘Harnessing tourism as a means of poverty alleviation: using the right language or achieving outcomes?’, Tourism Recreation Research, 32 (1), 2007, p 50.

25 Most notably Ashley, ‘Pro-poor tourism’; and Ashley et al, Pro-poor Tourism Strategies.

26 Pro-poor Tourism Partnership, at www.propoortourism.org.uk/ppt_pubs.

27 Mowforth & Munt, Tourism and Sustainability, pp 168–170; and D Fennell, Tourism Ethics, Clevedon: Channel View Publications, 2006, pp 161–162.

28 Ashley et al, Pro-poor Tourism Strategies, pp 28–34.

29 Goodwin, ‘Community-based tourism: failing to deliver?’, id21insights, 62, Brighton: Institute of Development Studies, 2006, p 1.

30 Jamieson et al, Contribution of Tourism to Poverty Alleviation, pp 20–23.

31 G Gereffi, J Humphrey, R Kaplinsky & T Sturgeon, ‘Introduction: globalisation, value chains and development’, ids Bulletin, 32 (3), 2001, p 2.

32 G Gereffi & R Kaplinsky (eds), ‘The value of value chains: spreading the gains from globalisation’, ids Bulletin (special issue), 32 (3), 2001; R Kaplinsky & M Morris, A Handbook for Value Chain Research, Brighton: Institute of Development Studies, 2001; and H Schmitz, Value Chain Analysis for Policy-Makers and Practitioners, Geneva: International Labour Organisation, 2005.

33 C Ashley, ‘Participation by the poor in Luang Prabang tourism economy: current earnings and opportunities for expansion’, Working Paper 273, London: Overseas Development Institute, 2006; J Mosedale, ‘Tourism commodity chains: market entry and its effects on St Lucia’, Current Issues in Tourism, 9 (4–5), 2006, pp 436–458; J Mitchell & J Faal, ‘Holiday package tourism and the poor in The Gambia’, Development Southern Africa, 24 (3), 2007, pp 445–464; and J Mitchell & LC Phuc, Final Report on Participatory Tourism Value Chain Analysis in Da Nang, Central Vietnam, London: mcg Management Consulting and Overseas Development Institute, 2007.

34 Y Yilmaz & U Bititci, ‘Performance measurement in tourism: a value chain model’, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 18 (4), 2006, pp 341–349; and Yilmaz & Bititci, ‘Performance measurement in the value chain: manufacturing v tourism’, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 55 (5), 2006, pp 371–389.

35 J Momsen, Report on Vegetable Production and the Tourist Industry in St Lucia, Alberta: University of Calgary, 1972; Momsen, Report on Food Production and the Tourist Industry in Montserrat, Alberta: University of Calgary, 1973; and RA Britton, ‘Making tourism more supportive of development: Caribbean tourism and St Vincent’, mimeo, Department of Geography, University of Minnesota, 1975.

36 Mitchell & Phuc, Final Report on Participatory Tourism Value Chain Analysis in Da Nang, pp 29–50.

37 Jamieson et al, Contribution of Tourism to Poverty Alleviation, pp 10–14.

38 Ashley, ‘Participation by the poor in Luang Prabang tourism economy’, p 10.

39 Ibid.

40 Ashley et al, Pro-poor Tourism Strategies, p 2.

41 Goodwin, ‘Pro-poor tourism’, p 5.

42 adb, The Greater Mekong Subregion Tourism Sector Strategy, Manila: adb, pp x, 121–125, emphasis added.

43 Scheyvens, ‘Exploring the tourism–poverty nexus’, pp 246–247; Mowthforth & Munt, Tourism and Sustainability, p 272; and CM Hall, ‘Pro-poor tourism: do tourism exchanges benefit primarily the countries of the South?’, Current Issues in Tourism, 10 (2–3), p 116.

44 Harrison & Shipani, ‘Lao tourism and poverty alleviation’, p 198.

45 H Becker, ‘Whose side are we on?’, Social Problems, 14 (3), 1967, pp 234–247; and A Gouldner, For Sociology: Renewal and Critique in Sociology Today, London: Allen Lane, 1973.

46 www.thetravelfoundation.org.uk, accessed 29 December 2007; and S Karammel & K Lengefeld, ‘Can all-inclusive tourism be pro-poor?’, id21insights, 62, 2006, p 6.

47 S Chok, J Macbeth & C Warren, ‘Tourism as a tool for poverty alleviation: a critical analysis of “pro-poor tourism” and implications for sustainability’, Current Issues in Tourism, 10 (2–3), 2007, p 153.

48 Ibid.

49 Scheyvens, ‘Exploring the tourism–poverty nexus’, p 248.

50 L Desforges, ‘State tourism institutions and neo-liberal development: a case study of Peru’, Tourism Geographies, 2 (2), 2000, pp 177–192; and K Konadu-Agyemang, ‘Structural adjustment programmes and the international tourism trade in Ghana, 1983–99: some socio-spatial implications’, Tourism Geographies, 3 (2), 2001, pp 187–206.

51 Ashley, ‘Participation by the poor in Luang Prabang tourism economy’, p 10.

52 Mowthforth & Munt, Tourism and Sustainability, p 273.

53 Ashley et al, Pro-poor Tourism Strategies, p 35; and Ashley, ‘Participation by the poor in Luang Prabang tourism economy’.

54 Harrison & Shipani, ‘Lao tourism and poverty alleviation’.

55 J Ap, ‘Residents’ perceptions of research on the social impacts of tourism’, Annals of Tourism Research, 17 (4), 1990, pp 611–612.

56 MD Smith & RS Krannich, ‘Tourism dependence and resident attitudes’, Annals of Tourism Research, 25 (4), 1998, pp 783–786, 798–800; and C Tosun, ‘Host perceptions of impacts: a comparative tourism study’, Annals of Tourism Research, 29 (1), 2002, pp 231–234.

57 Jamieson, Poverty Alleviation through Sustainable Tourism Development; and Denman & Denman, Tourism and Poverty Alleviation.

58 ‘Low-cost airlines as poverty alleviators’, Travel Impact Newswire, 6 July 2004.

59 Jamieson et al, Contribution of Tourism to Poverty Alleviation, pp 8–15.

60 Ashley, ‘Participation by the poor in Luang Prabang tourism economy’; Ashley et al, Pro-poor Tourism Strategies; and C Ashley & J Mitchell, ‘Assessing how tourism revenues reach the poor’, Briefing Paper, London: Overseas Development Institute, 21 June 2007.

61 M Lockwood, The State They're In: An Agenda for International Action on Poverty in Africa, Bourton-on-Dunsmore: itdg Publishing, 2005, pp 1–5.

62 D Schilcher, ‘Growth versus equity: the continuum of pro-poor tourism and neoliberal governance’, Current Issues in Tourism, 10 (2–3), 2007, p 182.

63 Ashley, ‘Participation by the poor in Luang Prabang tourism economy’, p 17; and Goodwin, ‘Community-based tourism’, p 7.

64 Chok et al, ‘Tourism as a tool for poverty alleviation’, pp 157–158.

65 C Beddoe, Labour Standards, Social Responsibility and Tourism: A Report by Tourism Concern, London: Tourism Concern, 2004.

66 A Bah & H Goodwin, ‘Improving access for the informal sector to tourism in The Gambia’, ppt Working Paper 15, London: Pro-Poor Tourism Partnership; Karammel & Lengefeld, ‘Can all-inclusive tourism be pro-poor?’; Mitchell & Faal, ‘Holiday package tourism and the poor in The Gambia’; and Rosetto et al, ‘Harnessing tourism as a means of poverty alleviation’, pp 50–53, 57.