Countdown to Ecstasy: development as eschatology

Abstract

This paper examines the antinomies posed by a consideration of development as eschatology. Development is generally conceived as a grand narrative with humanity progressing inevitably to a redemptive goal, whether this be revolution or Rostovian consumerism. It is eschatological in structure. This opens development theory up to critique. Grand narratives premised on an end of history are open to criticism as utopian and exclusory through setting a limit—they conceive of a redemptive ending of time, but repress those excluded from the vision. However, this eschatological structure may also have a function in the shape of the Derridian conception of ‘the promise’. This concept refers to a need to posit a closure that incorporates a redemptive, Messianic moment, which impels us to pursue the promise of that moment of development. Thus, the eschatological structure of development incorporates a risk of utopianism/exclusory violence—but we need the Messianic moment in order to conceptualise the goal that drives us to strive for progress.

Notes

1 Bob Sutcliffe, ‘The place of development in theories of imperialism and globalization’, in Ronaldo Munck & Denis O'Hearn, Critical Development Theory: Contributions to a New Paradigm, London: Zed Books, 1999, p 135.

2 Ibid, p 137.

3 Wolfgang Sachs, The Development Dictionary: A Guide to Knowledge as Power, London: Zed Books, 1992, p 1.

4 World Social Forum, at http://wsf2007.org/frontpage/info/about, accessed June 2007.

5 Quoted by Susan George, ‘Parallels, instead of a conclusion’, at http://www.tni-archives.org/detail_page.phtml?page=archives_george_parallel, accessed February 2007.

6 John Roberts, ‘Managing aid for results: the muddy waters of selecting partner countries’, at http://www.euforic.org/detail_page.phtml, accessed June 2005.

7 Stuart Sim, Fundamentalist World: The New Dark Age of Dogma, Cambridge: Icon Books, 2004, p 105.

8 Joseph Stiglitz, Globalization and its Discontents, London: Penguin, 2002, p xix.

9 Joseph Stiglitz, ‘There is no invisible hand', Guardian, 20 December 2002.

10 Quoted in Amartya Sen, Development as Freedom, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999, p 272.

11 Sen, Development as Freedom, p 279.

12 Robert Kuttner, Everything for Sale: The Virtues and Limits of Markets, Chicago, IL: Knopf, 1997, p 6.

13 Sutcliffe, ‘The place of development in theories of imperialism and globalization’, p 139.

14 Kathy Walker, ‘Dreaming, working, mourning: the role of teleology in early twentieth century Marxism’, at http://www.yorku.ca/jspot/5/kwalker.htm, accessed June 2007.

15 Norman Geras, ‘Minimum utopia: ten theses’, at http://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/philosophy/works/us/geras1.htm, accessed June 2007.

16 Marcuse, quoted in ibid.

17 ‘Politics and friendship: a discussion with Jacques Derrida’, at http://www.sussex.ac.uk/Units/frenchthought/derrida.htm, accessed June 2007.

18 Mark Dooley & Liam Kavanagh, The Philosophy of Derrida, Stocksfield, UK: Acumen, 2007, p 112.

19 Jacques Derrida, The Politics of Friendship, trans George Collins, London: Verso, 2005, p 306, emphasis in original.

20 Paul Patton, ‘Politics’, in Jack Reynolds & Jonathan Roffe, Understanding Derrida, New York: Continuum, 2004, p 34.

21 Jacques Derrida, Rogues: Two Essays on Reason, trans Pascale-Anne Brault & Michael Naas, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2005, p 86.