Abstract
This article addresses the question of the relationship between religion and national development in India and China. It argues that instead of looking at secularisation as a necessary process in national development, one should focus on secularism as a powerful project of intellectuals and the state in these societies. In the post-colonial period, anti-consumerism in China took the form of Maoist secular utopianism, while in India it took the form of Gandhian religious utopianism. The article argues that religious elements can be found in both Indian and Chinese secularisms.
Notes
1 P van der Veer, Imperial Encounters, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001.
2 C Taylor, Sources of the Self, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989.
3 T Masuzawa, The Invention of World Religions, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2005.
4 M Weber, Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Religionssoziologie, Vol 1, Tübingen: Mohr, 1986.
5 For a particularly clear argument for the need for a ‘modern religion’ in socioeconomic development and the positive role envisioned for the colonial government, one can refer to the famous Dutch Islamic scholar Christiaan Snouck Hurgronje, who was the governmental advisor for ‘Islamic Affairs’ in Dutch Indonesia. Hurgronje, Nederland and the Islam, Leiden: Brill, 1915.
6 One can find this argument also in John Stuart Mill's ideas about the colonised as children who needed to be educated before they could have self-rule. See U Singh Mehta, Liberalism and Empire, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1999.
7 C Geertz, Old Societies and New States: The Quest for Modernity in Asia and Africa, New York: Free Press, 1963.
8 S Huntington, The Clash of Civilizations, New York: Simon & Schuster, 1996.
9 V Goossaert, ‘L'anti-clericalisme en Chine’, Extreme-Orient/Extreme-Occident, 24, 2002.
10 J Scott, The Politics of the Veil, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2007.
11 D Ownby, ‘Imperial fantasies: the Chinese communists and peasant rebellions’, Comparative Studies in Society and History, 43, 2001, pp 65–91.
12 Cited in T Dubois, The Sacred Village: Social Change and Religious Life in Rural North China, Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press, 2005.
13 D Hervieu-Leger, Religion as a Chain of Memory, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2000.
14 JB ter Haar, ‘China's inner demons: the political impact of the demonological paradigm’, in WL Chong (ed), China's Great Proletarian Revolution: Master Narratives and post-Mao Counternarratives, London: Rowman & Littlefield, 2002, pp 27–46; and ter Haar, Telling Stories: Witchcraft and Scapegoating in Chinese History, Leiden: Brill, 2006.
15 K Dean, Taoist Ritual and Popular Cults of Southeast China, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1993.
16 CJ Fuller, Servants of the Goddess, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
17 R O'Hanlon, Caste, Conflict and Ideology: Mahatma Jotirao Phule and Low Caste Protest in Nineteenth-Century Western India, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
18 NB Dirks, ‘The conversion of caste: location, translation, and appropriation’, in P van der Veer (ed), Conversion to Modernities, New York: Routledge, 1996, pp 115–137.
19 G Prakash, Another Reason: Science and the Imagination of Modern India, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999.
20 P van der Veer, Religious Nationalism, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1994.
21 JC Heesterman, The Inner Conflict of Tradition: Essays in Indian Ritual, Kinship, and Society, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1985.
22 TN Madan, Modern Myths, Locked Minds: Secularism and Fundamentalism in India, Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1997; and A Nandy, ‘An anti-secularist manifesto’, India International Quarterly, 22(1), 1995, pp 35–64.
23 P van der Veer, ‘The ruined center: religion and mass politics in India’, Journal of International Affairs, 50(1), 1996, pp 254–277.
24 G Viswanathan, Outside the Fold, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999.
25 V de Grazia, Irresistible Empire: America's Advance through 20th Century Europe, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2005.
26 C Jaffrelot & P van der Veer (eds), Patterns of Middle-Class Consumption in India and China, Delhi: Sage, 2008.