Social Media and Global Development Rituals: a content analysis of blogs and tweets on the 2010 mdg Summit

Abstract

Social media content generated by web logs (‘blogs’) and Twitter messages (‘tweets’) constitute new types of data that can help us better understand the reproduction of global rituals in the context of international development policies and practice. Investigating the United Nations High-level Plenary Meeting of the General Assembly on the Millennium Development Goals (mdgs), a three-day event held at UN Headquarters in New York in 2010, as a case study, we examine a sample of 108 blog entries discussing the meeting, as well as 3007 related tweets. We find that topics receiving the densest coverage mirrored existing priorities as defined by the mdgs. Although most blog entries created content which, in contrast to tweets, went beyond spreading mere factual or referential information on the event and even included some critical commentary, sustained debates did not emerge. Our findings suggest that social media content accompanying the Summit reproduced global development rituals and thus failed to catalyse alternative priorities for and approaches to international development.

Notes

1 See, for example, H Farrell & D Drezner, ‘The power and politics of blogs’, Public Choice, 134(12), 2008, pp 15–30; R Maratea, ‘The e-rise and fall of social problems: the blogosphere as a public arena’, Social Problems, 55(1), 2008, pp 139–160; and B Etling, J Kelly, R Faris & J Palfrey, ‘Mapping the Arabic blogosphere: politics and dissent online’, New Media & Society, 12(8), 2010, pp 1225–1243.

2 A Breuer, The Role of Social Media in Mobilizing Political Protest: Evidence from the Tunisian Revolution, Bonn: German Development Institute, 2012; PN Howard & MR Parks, ‘Social media and political change: capacity, constraint, and consequence’, Journal of Communication, 62(2), 2012, pp 359–362; C Shirky, ‘The political power of social media technology, the public sphere, and political change’, Foreign Affairs, January/February, at http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/67038/clay-shirky/the-political-power-of-social-media; and S Aday, H Farrell, M Lynch, J Sides, J Kelly & E Zuckerman, Blogs and Bullets: New Media in Contentious Politics, Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace, 2010.

3 D Shiffman, ‘Twitter as a tool for conservation education and outreach: what scientific conferences can do to promote live-tweeting’, Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 2(3), 2012, pp 257-262.

4 K Weller, E Dröge, C Puschmann, ‘Citation analysis in Twitter: approaches for defining and measuring information flows within tweets during scientific conferences’, in M Rowe, M Stankovic, A Dadzie & M Hardey (eds), ‘Making sense of microposts (#MSM2011)’, workshop at Extended Semantic Web Conference (ESWC 2011), Crete, pp 1–12; C Ross, M Terras, C Warwick & A Welsh, ‘Enabled backchannel: conference Twitter use by digital humanists’, Department of Information Studies, University College London, at http://www.ucl.ac.uk/infostudies/Claire-ross/Digitally_Enabled_Backchannel.pdf; M Ebner & W Reinhardt, ‘Social networking in scientific conferences—Twitter as tool for strengthening a scientific community’, Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Science 2.0 for tel at the 4th European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning ( ec-tel ’09), 2009, at http://stellarnet.eu/science2ectel/Home; and W Reinhardt, M Ebner, G Beham & C Costa, ‘How people are using Twitter during conferences’, in V Hornung-Prähauser & M Luckmann (eds), Creativity and Innovation Competencies on the Web, Proceeding of 5th EduMedia Conference, Salzburg: Salzburg Research, 2009, pp 145–156.

5 D McKenzie & B Özler, ‘The impact of economics blogs’, Development Impact (blog), 5 August 2011, at http://blogs.worldbank.org/impactevaluations/node/621, accessed 21 June 2012.

6 H Thörn, ‘Global civil society and de-/democratization: aids politics, anti-apartheid and the World Social Forum’, Development Dialogue, 49(1), 2007, pp 159–169.

7 Ibid, p 169.

8 United Nations, Programme, 2010, at http://www.un.org/en/mdg/summit2010/programme.shtml, accessed 21 June 2012.

9 United Nations, ‘High-level plenary meeting on the millennium development goals: a compilation of partnership events and action commitments’, 2010, at http://www.un.org/en/mdg/summit2010/pdf/HLPM_Side%2520events_CRP.pdf, accessed 21 June 2012.

10 United Nations, ‘UN summit concludes with adoption of global action plan to achieve development goals by 2015’, 2010, at http://www.who.int/pmnch/media/membernews/2010/20100922_un_closingpr.pdf, accessed 21 June 2012.

11 United Nations, Keeping the Promise: United to Achieve the Millennium Development Goals, United Nations General Assembly, A/RES/65/1, at http://www.un.org/en/mdg/summit2010/pdf/outcome_documentN1051260.pdf, accessed 21 June 2012.

12 usun, ‘Remarks by President Barack Obama at the millennium development goals summit’, 2010, at http://usun.state.gov/briefing/statements/2010/ 147593.htm, accessed 7 July 2011.

13 dfid, ‘Speech by Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg at the United Nations millennium development goals summit’, 2010, at http://www.dfid.gov.uk/Media-Room/News-Stories/2010/Deputy-Prime-Minister-Nick-Cleggs-speech-to-the-UN-General-Assembly/, accessed 21 June 2012.

14 United Nations. ‘Statement by he Mr Sergey Lavrov, Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation’, 2010, at http://www.un.org/en/mdg/summit2010/debate/RU_en.pdf, accessed 21 June 2012.

15 United Nations, ‘Statement by he Mr SM Krishna Minister of External Affairs of India’, 2010, at http://www.un.org/en/mdg/summit2010/debate/IN_en.pdf, accessed 21 June 2012.

16 United Nations, ‘Towards the attainment of the millennium development goals: statement by he Wen Jiabao, Premier of the State Council of the People’s Republic of China’, 2010, at http://www.un.org/en/mdg/summit2010/debate/CN_en.pdf, accessed 21 June 2012.

17 United Nations, Statement by he Marcia Helena Carvalho Lopes, Minister for Social Development and the Fight Against aids’, 2010, at http://www.un.org/en/mdg/summit2010/debate/BR_en.pdf, accessed 21 June 2012.

18 T Paulson, ‘Melinda Gates impatiently optimistic at the UN anti-poverty summit’, Humanosphere (blog), 2010, 24 September, at http://humanosphere.kplu.org/2010/09/melinda-gates-impatiently-optimistic-at-the-un-anti-poverty-summit/, accessed 21 June 2012.

19 R Abdulla, ‘Queen Rania speaks at the mdg summit in New York’, 2010, at http://www.queenrania.jo/media/speeches/queen-rania-speaks-mdg-summit-new-york, accessed 21 June 2012.

20 P Guest, ‘mdg interview: Jeffery Sachs’, This is Africa (blog), 22 September 2010, at http://web.thisisafricaonline.com/News/MDG-Interview-Jeffrey-Sachs, accessed 21 June 2012.

21 K Arsenault, ‘September 2010 mdg summit: 13 minutes you just can’t miss’, One (blog), 18 November 2010, at http://one.org/blog/category/september-2010-mdg-summit/?aux=36, accessed 21 June 2012.

22 N Long, ‘Contesting policy ideas from below’, in M Bøås & D McNeill (eds), Global Institutions and Development: Framing the World?, London: Routledge, 2004, pp 24–40.See also M Bøås & D McNeill, Multilateral Institutions: A Critical Introduction, London: Zed Books, 2003.

23 Bøås & McNeill, Global Institutions and Development; and D Mosse, Cultivating Development: An Ethnography of Aid Policy and Practice, London: Pluto Press, 2005.

24 R Harper, Inside the imf : An Ethnography of Documents, Technology and Organisational Action, London: Academic Press, 1998; and D Mosse & D Lewis, The Aid Effect: Giving and Governing in International Development, London: Pluto Press, 2005.

25 D Mosse, ‘Introduction: the anthropology of expertise and professionals in international development’, in D Mosse (ed), Adventures in Aidland: The Anthropology of Professional International Development, Oxford: Berghahn Books, 2011, pp 1–31; and A Fechter & H Hindman, Inside the Everyday Lives of Development Workers: The Challenges and Futures of Aidland, Sterling, VA: Kumarian Press, 2011.

26 C Chabbott, ‘Constructing educational consensus: international development professionals and the world conference on education for all’, International Journal of Educational Development, 18(3), 1998, pp 207–218.

27 See also M Schechter, United Nations-sponsored World Conferences: Focus on Impact and Follow-up, Tokyo: unu Press, 2001.

28 United Nations, United Nations Global Conferences: What have they Accomplished?, New York: UN Department of Public Information, 1998.

29 P Little, ‘Ritual, power and ethnography at the Rio Earth Summit’, Critique of Anthropology, 15(3), 1995, pp 265–288.

30 Ibid.

31 F Lechner & J Boli, ‘Constructing world culture’, in Lechner & Boli (eds), World Culture: Origins and Consequences, Oxford: Blackwell, 2005, pp 81–108.

32 E Rothenbuhler, Ritual Communication: From Everyday Conversation to Mediated Ceremony, London: Sage, 1998, p 27.

33 R Bauman, ‘Performance’, in E Barnouw (ed), International Encyclopedia of Communications, Vol 3, New York: Oxford University Press, 1989, pp 262–266.

34 Lechner & Boli, ‘Constructing world culture’, p 102.

35 J Vandemoortele, ‘Can the mdgs foster a new partnership for pro-poor policies?’, in J Brinkerhoff, S Smith & H Teegen (eds), ngo s and the Millennium Development Goals: Citizen Action to Reduce Poverty, London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007, pp 23–48.

36 D Hulme & S Fukuda-Parr, International Norm Dynamics and ‘the End of Poverty’: Understanding the Millennium Development Goals ( mdgs ), bwpi Working Paper 96, Manchester: Brooks World Poverty Institute, 2009.

37 Ibid, p 16.

38 Little, ‘Ritual, power, and ethnography at the Rio Earth Summit’, p 286.

39 ‘Top 100 twitaholics based on number of followers’, at http://twitaholic.com/, 2011, accessed 21 June 2012.

40 ‘200 million tweets per day’, Twitter Blog, 30 June 2011, at http://blog.twitter.com/2011/06/200-million-tweets-per-day.html, accessed 21 June 2012.

41 D Boyd, S Golder & G Lotan, ‘Tweet, tweet, retweet: conversational aspects of retweeting on Twitter’, in Proceedings of the Forty-Third Hawai’i International Conference on System Sciences, Kauai, HI, 6 January 2010.

42 D Li & G Walejko, ‘Splogs and abandoned blogs: the perils of sampling bloggers and their blogs’, Information, Communication & Society, 11(2), 2008, pp 279–296.

43 K Browne, ‘Snowball sampling: using social networks to research non-heterosexual women’, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 2005, pp 47–60.

44 J Creswell & D Miller, ‘Determining validity in qualitative inquiry’, Theory into Practice, 39(3), 2000, pp 124–130.

45 T Foremski, ‘The “Golden Arches” of ted and the rise of the techno-humanists’, 2012, at http://www.zdnet.com/the-golden-arches-of-ted-and-the-rise-of-the-techno-humanists-7000002076/, accessed 21 September 2012.

46 DE Esser, ‘More money, less cure: why global health assistance needs restructuring’, Ethics & International Affairs, 23(3), 2009, pp 225–234.

47 JD Sachs, ‘China’s performance at the UN summit is extraordinary’, Beyondbricks (blog), 22 September 2010, at http://blogs.ft.com/beyond-brics/2010/09/22/jeffrey-sachs-extraordinary-china/#axzz1Re6UbSGe, accessed 21 June 2012.

48 D Green, ‘Is the blogging bubble about to burst?’, From Poverty to Power (blog), 15 June 2011, at http://www.oxfamblogs.org/fp2p/?p=5790, accessed 21 June 2012.

49 Cf Weller et al, ‘Citation analysis in Twitter’.

50 Reinhardt et al, ‘How people are using Twitter during conferences’.

51 M Ebner & W Reinhardt, ‘Social networking in scientific conferences’.

52 E Rothenbuhler, Ritual Communication.

53 K Grepin, ‘One more reason why living in New York City is amazing’, Karen Grepin’s Global Health Blog, 18 September 2010, at http://karengrepin.com/2010/09/one-more-reason-why-living-in-new-york.html, accessed 21 June 2012.

54 A recent UN Foundation report notes that 89% of Americans surveyed were not familiar with the mdgs; however, when provided with a brief explanation of each, 87% of those surveyed said they believe the USA should be very or somewhat involved in trying to achieve the mdgs. These figures are, in part, a reflection of the level to which those surveyed could recall hearing about international events and associating humanitarian involvement with the UN, according to the researchers. The survey by WorldPublicOpinion.org showed a smaller but significant number of Americans (75%) is willing to pay the estimated individual cost of fully funding the goals. United Nations Foundation, ‘United Nations approval rating rises to 60% in new opinion poll’, 2010, at http://www.unfoundation.org/news-and-media/press-releases/2010/united-nations-approval-rating-rises-to-60-percent.html, accessed 21 June 2012; and World Public Opinion.org, ‘Publics in developed countries ready to contribute funds necessary to cut hunger in half by 2015’, 2008, at http://www.worldpublicopinion.org/pipa/articles/btdevelopmentaidra/554.php?lb=btda&pnt=554&nid=&id, accessed 22 June 2012.

55 E Rothenbuhler, Ritual Communication, p 15.

56 J George, Discourses of Global Politics: A Critical (Re)Introduction to International Relations, Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 1994; and T Teivainen, ‘The political and its absence in the World Social Forum: implications for democracy’, Development Dialogue, 49(1), 2007, pp 69–79.

57 F Debrix, ‘Language, nonfoundationalism, international relations’, in Debrix (ed), Language, Agency, and Politics in a Constructed World, London: M. E. Sharpe, 2003, pp 3–25.

58 A Lang, ‘Conflicting narratives, conflicting moralities: the United Nations and the failure of humanitarian intervention’, in F Debrix (ed), Language, Agency, and Politics in a Constructed World, London: ME Sharpe, 2003, pp 171–195.

59 C Bell, Ritual Theory, Ritual Practice, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992, p 206.

60 D Hulme & S Fukuda-Parr, International Norm Dynamics and ‘the End of Poverty’, p 30.

61 E Rothenbuhler, Ritual Communication, p 45.

62 See for example, H Thörn, ‘Global civil society and de-/democratization’.

63 R Dahl, Democracy and its Critics, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1989; and D Held, Democracy and the Global Order: From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Governance, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1995.

64 D Mosse, ‘Introduction’, p 22.

65 Ibid.

66 S Schimmelpfennig, ‘Tracking the World Vision/nfl shirt donation controversy: Good Intentions are not enough’ (blog), 12 February 2011, at http://goodintents.org/aid-debates/world-vision-nfl-controversy, accessed 24 June 2012.