Global South rhetoric in India’s policy projection

Abstract

While an on-going statist project tries to portray India as a ‘rising power’ in world politics, the fact remains that India’s global projection continues to be heavily fashioned by the Global South rhetoric. Such rhetoric is inclusive of irredentism and contestation with western norms and ideals along with cooperation leading to a complex process of interactions shaping up the global order. For countries like India being claimant to the status of ‘civilisational state’, the strong urge for autonomy along with the self-perception of national and cultural greatness is shared by the elite along with a sense of strategic importance. Such identity formation, however, reduces and sometimes obliterates the gaps between ‘internal’ and ‘external’, bringing into academic scrutiny the whole range of policymaking and to what extent it matches the state rhetoric.

Keywords:

• Third World
• Global South
• India
• civilisation
• decolonisation
• irredentism

Notes

1. Lopez, “Introduction,” 8.

2. Christiansen and Scarlett, “Introduction,” 4.

3. Grovogu, “Revolution Nonetheless,” 175–6.

4. Nehru, “Speech.”

5. Saran, “India and China.”

6. Rudolph, “Four Variants,” 137–56.

7. Ibid., 148.

8. Braudel, Perspective of the World Civilization, 484.

9. Bagchi, Perilous Passage, 135.

10. Naidu, “Whither the Look East Policy,” 333.

11. Bose, Hundred Horizons, 16.

12. Vasudevan and Sarkar, “Colonial Dominance and Indigenous Response,” 29.

13. Dirlik, “Spectres of the Third World,” 133.

14. Chen, trans. Liu, “What the ‘Third World’ Means,” 536.

15. Chakrabarti and Dhar, “Gravel in the Shoe,” 116.

16. Yee, “Three World Theory,” 239.

17. Giley, “Challenge,” 1406.

18. Nehru, “Inter-Asian Relations,” 327.

19. Vasudevan and Sarkar, “Colonial Dominance and Indigenous Response,” 51.

20. Grovogu, “Revolution Nonetheless,” 178.

21. Appadorai, Select Documents, 21.

22. Dutt, India and the Third World, 150.

23. Jain, India’s Foreign Policy, 312.

24. Sibal, “Don’t be Limited.”

25. Giley, “Challenge,” 1405.

26. Miller, Wronged by Empire, 2.

27. Betz, “India,” 239.

28. Mishra, “Emulated or National?,” 69–102.

29. Mukherjee and Malone, “Indian Foreign Policy, 87.

30. Taylor, “India’s Rise in Africa,” 797.

31. Bava, “New Powers for Global Change,” 5.

32. Khilnani et al., Nonalignment 2.0, 69.

33. Madsen et al., “Introduction,” 2.

34. Andersen, “Domestic Roots of Indian Foreign Policy,” 264.

35. Andersen, “Domestic Roots of Indian Foreign Policy,” 268.

36. Thomas, “Where is the Third World Now?”, 229.

37. Giley, “Challenge,” 1407.

38. Dirlik, “Spectres of the Third World,” 146.