Semi-periphery regionalisms in a changing world order: the case of Mercosur and Visegrad Group

Abstract

After the ‘unipolar moment’ of the 1990s, the emerging multipolar world order has brought a new environment for regional organisations, which they are adjusting to. Mercosur and Visegrad Group, with semi-peripheral member states, are both categorised as intermediate regions with close institutionalised and cultural links to the Western world, while structural political and economic features distinguish them from the core regions. Carrying out a comparative analysis, the article’s research question is: How have leadership, objectives and actorness changed in the case of Mercosur and Visegrad Group since 2000 as a response to the changing world order? A case study analysis explains the similarities and differences between Mercosur’s and Visegrad Group’s responses to and performance in the changing world order. Criticisms towards the traditional partners, shifting agendas, a search for alternatives beyond the Western model of market democracy and building links with emerging partners are the most essential similarities of Mercosur’s and Visegrad Group’s responses.

Keywords:

• Visegrad Group
• Mercosur
• semi-periphery
• comparative regionalism
• world order

Acknowledgements

Special thanks goes to Beáta Paragi; I am very grateful for her useful comments.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.

Notes

1 Although the OAS did not suspend Venezuela’s membership during the Chávez era (1999–2013).

2 For more details on Mercosur’s external relations and partners see Ramanzini and Luciano (2020, 6).

Additional information

Notes on contributors

Bernadett Lehoczki

Bernadett Lehoczki graduated as an economist (2003) and earned her PhD at Corvinus University of Budapest (2009). She wrote her dissertation on relations between China and Latin America, focussing on diversification opportunities in the Latin American region. Her research has mainly focussed on Latin America’s place in the international system, regionalism in Latin America and inter-regional links beyond the core regions. Most recently she has started to focus on a comparative analysis of Latin America and Central Eastern Europe.