The past five years have seen a torrent of writings, pronouncements, warnings, statements of intent, programmes of action and suchlike by a range of agencies both national and international on the theme of corruption and what to do about it. Paralleling the outpouring of public utterances, social scientists have also addressed themselves to analysing the phenomenon and reflecting upon its apparent causes. Not infrequently these analyses have been centred around the notion of the neo-patrimonial state and by implication its converse, some loosely conceived 'modern' state. By means of an exploration of the nature and extent of neo-patrimonialism in both less developed (LDCS) and developed (DCs) countries, this article suggests that not only is the underpinning dichotomy merely descriptive and therefore analytically unproductive, but the consequent policy implications may be both misplaced and inappropriate.
Reprints and Corporate Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:
Academic Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:
If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.
Related Research Data
Related research
People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.
Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.
Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.