ABSTRACT
The porous external border around the Schengen member states of the European Union (EU) became a colossal political problem in 2015 and 2016 as the migrant and Refugee Crisis unfolded. In Beetham’s seminal terminology, there was a crisis between the EU’s power and legitimacy on all three dimensions hereof: The Dublin regime was not followed, there was a gap between the beliefs of the governing and the subordinate peoples, and there were increasingly critical views among citizens and politicians alike (even from mainstream parties) against the inflow of refugees and migrants outside of the normal asylum system. The behaviour of the EU actors since then can be interpreted as an attempt at containing this crisis as regards Beetham’s legitimacy dimensions.
Notes on contributor
Peter Nedergaard is Professor of Political Science. His key research interests are comparative politics, the political economy of European cooperation, and political theory. He has published in journals such as Journal of Common Market Studies, Journal of European Public Policy, and Policy Studies.
Notes
1. This article is a significantly extended and thoroughly revised version of an article entitled “Grænser og EU's (manglende) legitimitet” in the Danish journal “Samfundsøkonomen”, No. 3: 33–38.” I appreciate the comments to an earlier version of the article by the reviewers of Policy Studies and by my colleague, Professor Anders Wivel.