416
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Maternal leukocytosis after antenatal corticosteroid administration: a systematic review and meta-analysisFootnote*

, , , , &
Pages 210-216 | Received 21 Oct 2016, Accepted 13 May 2017, Published online: 14 Sep 2017
 

Abstract

Although it is known that corticosteroid administration causes leukocytosis, the magnitude and length of time this leukocytosis persists is unknown during pregnancy. This study aimed to establish the expected range of maternal leukocytosis in healthy pregnant women at risk for preterm delivery after antenatal corticosteroid administration. PubMed, Embase and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched to identify the studies in healthy women at risk for preterm delivery without signs of clinical infection that reported white blood cell values preceding and after antenatal corticosteroid administration. The inverse variance weighting technique was used to calculate the weighted means and the standard deviation from the mean for each time period. Six studies met inclusion criteria and included 524 patients and 1406 observations. Mean ± standard deviation maternal white blood cell count values prior to antenatal corticosteroid administration and up to 24, 48, 72 and 96 hours after corticosteroid administration were 10.4 ± 2.4, 13.6 ± 3.6, 12.1 ± 3.0, 11.5 ± 2.9 and 11.1 ± 2.5 × 109/L, respectively. Leukocytosis in healthy, non-infected women is expected to peak 24 hours after antenatal corticosteroid administration and the magnitude of increase is small.

    Impact statement

  • What is already known on this subject: While it is well known that administration of antenatal corticosteroids causes leukocytosis, it is currently unknown the magnitude and length of time the leukocytosis persists.

  • What the results of this study add: This study establishes the expected range and the temporal progression and regression with antenatal corticosteroid administration in healthy pregnant women at risk for preterm delivery without clinical signs of infection.

  • What the implications are of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research: Clinicians may wish to consider further investigation into the clinical cause, whether infectious or non-infectious, for absolute values and changes outside this range.

Graphical Abstract

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Keerthana Sankar B.S., Robert Schoenfeld B.S., Katherine Boyer B.S. and Danielle Isham B.S. (Research Assistants, University of Michigan, funded by the Department of Anesthesiology) for their administrative assistance with this systematic review.

Disclosure statement

The authors report no declarations of interest.

Notes

* This work was presented in part as an oral presentation at the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Annual Clinical and Scientific Meeting, Washington D.C, 14–17 May 2016.

Additional information

Funding

This work was funded by the University of Michigan Department of Anesthesiology.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.