108
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Prognostic significance of positive peritoneal cytology in endometrial cancer patients

, &
Pages 2336-2340 | Published online: 26 Apr 2022
 

Abstract

Although peritoneal cytology has been shown to be an independant predictor of survival in endometrial cancer, the present international federation of gynaecology and obstetrics (FIGO) staging system does not involve it for risk stratification. This work aimed to assess the prognostic importance of PPC (positive peritoneal cytology) in endometrial cancer patients. The medical profiles of uterine carcinoma patients were reviewed who were referred to Khatam-al- Anbia and Bahman hospital within 2010–2019. The factors possibly affecting peritoneal fluid cytology in all patients were analysed. There was a considerable association between survival and the number of lymph nodes involvement (95% CI = 2.5 − 12.51, OR = 5.59, p < .001), stage 3 (95% CI = 2.95–22.10, OR = 7.12, p < .001), stage IV (95% CI = 2.14 − 30.09, OR = 8.04, p < .001), Grade (95% CI = 4.4–47.7, OR = 14.54, p < .001). Positive peritoneal cytology was revealed in our study, as an independent prognostic factor in patients with endometrial cancer.

    Impact statement

  • What is already known on this subject? Peritoneal cytology is one of the independent risk factors for poor survival for endometrial cancer, but international federation of gynaecology and obstetrics (FIGO) staging system does not involve it for risk stratification.

  • What do the results of this study add? Positive peritoneal cytology was revealed in our study, as an independent prognostic factor in patients with endometrial cancer.

  • What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? It is recommended peritoneal cytology for future FIGO staging reviews. Till now, peritoneal washings need to be still regarded as a key part for precise risk-stratification.

Acknowledgement

The institutional review board and ethic committee of Imam Khomeini hospital approved the study protocol. The authors thanks deputy of research and technology from Tehran University of Medical Sciences for supporting this work as well as health stuff of Khatam-al- Anbia and Bahman hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, for their kind cooperation.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Health Services.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.