119
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Exploring and comparing pedagogical beliefs of university instructors in relation to their behavioural patterns regarding learning management system use

&
Received 24 May 2023, Accepted 01 Feb 2024, Published online: 12 Feb 2024
 

ABSTRACT

Understanding the relationship between instructors’ pedagogical beliefs and their usage of learning management systems (LMSs) is crucial in higher education. This study addresses this research gap by studying how 64 active university teachers’ pedagogical beliefs match their LMS usage behaviours. Based on 1374 LMS courses, this study intended to illuminate the complex relationship between teachers’ traditional, constructivist, ICT-based beliefs and operational behaviours while using an LMS for technology-enhanced instruction. Four patters were found: low-use (67.2%), administration-oriented (20.3%), communication-oriented (9.4%), and assessment-oriented (3.1%), which provide insights into how university instructors engage with LMS tools, highlighting the different LMS tool-adoption strategies used in higher education. Intriguing links were found between actual usage patterns and pedagogical beliefs, indicating that administration-oriented and low-usage patterns were related with weaker beliefs in ICT use, with the former having the highest constructivist belief scores and the latter recording the lowest. Instructors with communication use patterns had the lowest traditionalist beliefs, while those focusing on assessment had the highest. This research underscores the significance of aligning pedagogical approaches with technology integration within the context of higher education instruction, offering vital insights for universities committed to ongoing improvement in teaching practices and the effective utilisation of LMS technologies.

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank Ms. Lan Tao's invaluable assistance in analyzing the data.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by National Science and Technology Council, Taiwan [grant number NSTC 112-2410-H-024 -001 -MY2].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 333.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.