This essay provides a critical analysis of the major attitudinal positions on women's language and assesses implications of these positions for women's self‐identities and for pedagogical approaches designed to facilitate women's communication skills. The positions on women's language that are addressed are: (1) the deficit position, (2) the new deficit position, (3) the difference position, and (4) the code‐switching position.
Political and pedagogical implications of attitudes towards women's language
Reprints and Corporate Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:
Academic Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:
If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.
Related research
People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.
Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.
Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.