Critics have never conceptualized Wollstonecraft, Fuller and Grimke as a unified trio of feminist angst in the age of reform in which they lived. This essay invites rhetorical critics to re‐appraise the way we study discrete social movements and pay isolated tribute to woman's rights figures. It examines how each rhetor co‐opted the ideational and stylistic rhetorical characteristics of pre‐existing social movements (The Enlightenment, Transcendentalism, and Abolitionism) to create symbolic convergence and nascent rhetorical visions of woman's rights.
Mary Wollstonecraft, Margaret Fuller, and Angelina Grimke: Symbolic convergence and a nascent rhetorical vision
Reprints and Corporate Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:
Academic Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:
If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.
Related research
People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.
Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.
Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.