204
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

B-Raf inhibitor vemurafenib counteracts sulfur mustard-induced epidermal impairment through MAPK/ERK signaling

, ORCID Icon, , , &
Pages 226-235 | Received 10 May 2021, Accepted 16 Dec 2021, Published online: 05 Jan 2022
 

Abstract

The chemical warfare agent sulfur mustard (SM) causes severe cutaneous lesions characterized by epidermal cell death, apoptosis, and inflammation. At present, the molecular mechanisms underlying SM-induced injury are not well understood, and there is no standard treatment protocol for SM-exposed patients. Here, we conducted a high-content screening of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved drug library of 1018 compounds against SM injury on an immortal human keratinocyte HaCaT cell line, focusing on cell survival. We found that the B-Raf inhibitor vemurafenib had an apparent therapeutic effect on HaCaT cells and resisted SM toxicity. Other tested B-Raf inhibitors, both type-I (dabrafenib and encorafenib) and type-II (RAF265 and AZ628), also exhibited potent therapeutic effects on SM-exposed HaCaT cells. Both SM and vemurafenib triggered extracellular signal-related kinase (ERK) activation. The therapeutic effect of vemurafenib in HaCaT cells during SM injury was ERK-dependent, indicating a specific role of ERK in keratinocyte regulatory mechanisms. Furthermore, vemurafenib partially improved cutaneous damage in a mouse ear vesicant model. Collectively, our results provide evidence that the B-Raf inhibitor vemurafenib is a potential therapeutic agent against SM injury, and oncogenic B-Raf might be an exciting new therapeutic target following exposure to mustard vesicating agents.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Zhang Xiaorui (Beijing Institute of Pharmacology & Toxicology) for the technical assistance.

Ethical approval

All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. All experiments were conducted according to the NHI Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and approved by the Bioethics Committee of the Beijing Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology (no. 80-23). The study does not involve any experiments with human participants.

Authors contributions

Zhiyong Xiao: conceptualization, methodology, visualization, writing-original draft. Feng Liu: investigation, resources. Junping Cheng: investigation. Ying Wang: investigation. Wenxia Zhou: supervision, validation, funding acquisition. Yongxiang Zhang: supervision, funding acquisition.

Disclosure statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology of China [Grant Nos. 2013ZX09J13103-01B, 2016ZX09J16104-001, and 2019ZX09J19101].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 1,271.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.