97
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Accuracy Assessment of the TOPEX/Poseidon Ionosphere Measurements

, , , , &
Pages 729-739 | Published online: 12 Aug 2010
 

Abstract

We conducted an assessment of the TOPEX dual-frequency nadir ionosphere observations in the TOPEX/Poseidon (T/P) GDR by comparing TOPEX with the Center for Orbit Determination in Europe (CODE) Global Ionosphere Map (GIM), the climatological model IRI2001, and the DORIS (onboard T/P) relative ionosphere delays. We investigated the TOPEX (TOPEX Side A and TOPEX Side B altimeters, TSA and TSB, respectively) ionosphere observations for the time period 1995–2001, covering periods of low, intermediate, and high solar activity. Here, we use absolute path delays (at Ku-band frequency of the TOPEX altimeter and with positive signs) rather than Total Electron Content (TEC). We found significant biases between GIM and TOPEX (GIM–TOPEX) nadir ionosphere path delays: −8.1 ± 0.4 {mm} formal uncertainties and equivalent to 3.7 TECu) and −9.0 ± 0.7 {mm} (4.1 TECu) for TSA and TSB, respectively, indicating that the TOPEX path delay is longer (or with higher TECu) than GIM. The estimated relative biases vary with latitude and with daytime or nighttime passes. The estimated biases in the path delays (DORIS–TOPEX) are: −10.9 ± 0.4 {mm} (5.0 TECu) and −14.8 ± 0.6 {mm} (6.7 TECu), for TSA and TSB, respectively. There is a distinct jump of the DORIS path delays (−3.9 ± 0.7 {mm}, TSA delays longer than TSB delays) at the TSB altimeter switch in February 1999, presumably due to inconsistent DORIS processing. The origin of the bias between GIM (GPS, L-band) and TOPEX (radar altimeter, Ku-band) is currently unknown and warrants further investigation. Finally, the estimated drift rates between GIM and TSA, DORIS and TSA ionosphere path delays for the 6-year study span are −0.4 mm/yr and −0.8 mm/yr, respectively, providing a possible error bound for the TOPEX/Poseidon sea level observations during periods of low and intermediate solar activity.

Acknowledgments

The Ohio State University team is supported by NOAA's Laboratory for Satellite Altimetry, NASA's Interdisciplinary Science Program, NSF's Aeronomy program and NSF's Aeronomy program (ATM-0418844). TOPEX/Poseidon altimeter data products are provided by JPL PO–DAAC and the Global Ionosphere Map (GIM) data are provided by the Center for Orbit Determination in Europe (CODE). We thank Attila Komjathy of NASA/JPL, two anonymous reviewers, and George Born (the editor) for their constructive reviews and comments.

Color figure version of this article is available online (http://geodesy.eng.ohio-state.edu/publications).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 312.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.