7
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

PERFORMANCE OF THE GEM CODES ON NONSEPARABLE 5- AND 9-POINT OPERATORS

Pages 395-408 | Received 10 Jul 1981, Accepted 01 Sep 1981, Published online: 21 May 2007
 

Abstract

Timing and accuracy tests of the GEM (general elliptic marching) codes are described. The GEM codes solve elliptic and mixed discretized two-dimensional partial differential equations by direct (noniterative) spatial marching methods. Both 5-point and 9-point stencils may be solved, with no requirement that the coefficients be separable, and quite general boundary conditions are treated. The basic GEM code depends on problem parameters (primarily a large cell aspect ratio Δ/Δy) to control the instability incurred in marching elliptic equations. For a 5-point operator with non-periodic boundary conditions, repeat solutions are obtained in the time equivalent of two SOR iterations. Stabilizing codes allow an increase of the problem size in the marching direction at some penalty in execution time and core storage.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.