![Sample our Physical Sciences journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/110819/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Physical-Sciences.jpg"})
Abstract
Hydrolyzed products of Al(III) have affinity below pHzpc for oppositely charged mono and bi‐nuclear species of hexavalent chromium. This study investigates the comparative performance of electrocoagulation (EC) and chemical coagulation (CC) for the removal of Cr(VI) from aqueous solution. The highest removal of Cr(VI) achieved with EC was about 42% with 4.36 mA/cm2 current density. Cathodic adsorption of chromium boosted up Cr(VI) removal during EC. Simultaneous electro‐ and chemical‐dissolution lead to high current efficiency of about 178%. Both the pH and the coagulant dosage have a significant impact on Cr(VI) removal in the pH ranges from 4.9 to 7.0. CC with alum and aluminum sulfate (AS) removed about 11% and 12% of Cr(VI). Co‐adsorption of divalent SO4 2− ions with Cr(VI) is responsible for the lower removal observed with chemical coagulants. About 0.061 and 0.099 mole of SO4 2− was adsorbed per mole Al in the precipitate in the pH range 4.9 to 7.0 with AS and alum. A higher coagulant dosage increases the removal of Cr(VI) but adversely affects the removal efficiency (Cr(VI) removed per unit of Al dosing). Cell current density (CD) has shown little effect on Cr(VI) removal and the pH elevation at the same charge density. Higher initial Cr(VI) concentration improves the removal efficiency as the species of Cr(VI) is acidic in solution and decreases the pH elevation rate.