119
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Full-Scale Testing of a Caustic Side Solvent Extraction System to Remove Cesium from Savannah River Site Radioactive Waste

, , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 2797-2813 | Received 25 Oct 2007, Accepted 07 Apr 2008, Published online: 06 Aug 2008
 

Abstract

Savannah River Site (SRS) personnel have completed construction and assembly of the Modular Caustic Side Solvent Extraction Unit (MCU) facility. Following assembly, they conducted testing to evaluate the ability of the process to remove non-radioactive cesium and to separate the aqueous and organic phases. They conducted tests at salt solution flow rates of 3.5, 6.0, and 8.5 gpm.

During testing, the MCU Facility collected samples and submitted them to Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) personnel for analysis of cesium, Isopar® L, and modifier [1-(2,2,3,3-tetrafluoropropoxy)-3-(4-sec-butylphenoxy)-2-propanol]. SRNL personnel analyzed the aqueous samples for cesium by Inductively-Coupled Plasma Mass Spectroscopy (ICP-MS) and the solvent samples for cesium using a Parr Bomb digestion followed by ICP-MS. They analyzed aqueous samples for Isopar® L and modifier by gas chromatography (GC).

The conclusions from the cesium analyses follow.

The cesium in the feed samples measured 15.8 mg/L, in agreement with expectations.

The decontamination factor measured 181–1580 at a salt solution flow rate of 3.5 gpm, 211–252 at a salt solution flow rate of 6.0 gpm, and 275–878 at a salt solution flow rate of 8.5 gpm.

The concentration factor measured 11.0–11.1 at 3.5 gpm salt solution flow rate, 12.8–13.2 at 6.0 gpm salt solution flow rate, and 12.0–13.2 at 8.5 gpm salt solution flow rate.

The organic carryover from the final extraction contactor (#7) varied between 22 and 710 mg/L Isopar® L. The organic carryover was less at the lowest flow rate.

The organic carryover from the final strip contactor (#7) varied between 80 and 180 mg/L Isopar® L.

The organic carryover in the Decontaminated Salt Solution Hold Tank (DSSHT) and the Strip Effluent Hold Tank (SEHT) was less than 10 mg/L Isopar® L, indicating good recovery of the solvent by the coalescers and decanters.

Notes

DSS: decontaminated salt solution.

SE: strip effluent.

DF: decontamination factor (DF = Csfeed/CsDSS).

CF: concentration factor (DF = Csstrip/Csfeed).

DSS: decontaminated salt solution.

SE: strip effluent.

DF: decontamination factor (DF = Csfeed/CsDSS).

CF: concentration factor (DF = Csstrip/Csfeed).

DSS: decontaminated salt solution.

SE: strip effluent.

DF: decontamination factor (DF = Csfeed/CsDSS).

CF: concentration factor (DF = Csstrip/Csfeed).

DSS: decontaminated salt solution.

SE: strip effluent.

SHT: solvent hold tank.

DF: decontamination factor (DF = Csfeed/CsDSS).

CF: concentration factor (DF = Csstrip/Csfeed).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 681.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.