280
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

The recognition of prior learning (RPL) as pedagogical practice: tensions and affordances in assessment

ORCID Icon
Received 22 Aug 2022, Accepted 06 Jun 2023, Published online: 19 Jun 2023
 

ABSTRACT

An effective system of Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL) requires assessment processes that are appropriate for the nature of the experiential learning being assessed. Otherwise, potential candidates may be discouraged from engaging in RPL applications and therefore not benefit from the lifelong learning opportunities available. It has been argued that foregrounding RPL as a specialised pedagogical practice, and not just as assessment, can help in this regard. This article draws on the conceptualisation of RPL as ‘pedagogical pragmatism’, as developed by Pokorny et al. (Citation2017), and asks how this might look in practice and how might it help in creating assessment processes that reflect the epistemological particularity of prior experiential learning. A cohort RPL project that ran in ten Education and Training Boards (ETBs) in Ireland, in partnership with the Irish Defence Forces (DF) in 2018 to 2019, provides the basis for the research. A key theme in the results is the integrated nature of RPL assessment in its design and operation, and the way in which formative and summative assessment are brought into productive relation and understanding the affordances in assessment can help drive practice forward.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Correction Statement

This article has been corrected with minor changes. These changes do not impact the academic content of the article.

Notes

1 Schön (Citation1987) defines technical rationality as an ‘epistemology of practice derived from positivist philosophy’ (3). Technical rationality holds that ‘rigorous professional practitioners solve well-formed instrumental problems by applying theory and technique derived from systematic preferably scientific knowledge’ (4). For Schön, relying on such technical rationality ignores the complexity of actual experience and practice.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 407.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.