Abstract
This article draws upon research examining the impact of new health imperatives on schools in the United Kingdom. Specifically, it examines features of emerging surveillant relations, which not only speak to the changing nature of health-related practices in schools but have particular currency for broader understandings of theorisations of surveillance, and which complicate the view that schools are bounded or territorialised in enacting forms of governance. The article explores how the assemblages through which these biopedagogies are formed constitute emerging interdependent relations between schools and families. The article recognises the presence of amalgamated and extended pedagogies in schools; approaches within which deliberate attempts were made to ensure whether what students learn in schools was continued beyond the formal school contexts. Among the schools that took part in the research reported in this article, many of them recognised that families constituted a site of learning about health. To this end, there were deliberate attempts to inculcate particular health values and meanings within school and to extend these across other sites of learning such as within the family. The use of surveillant practices utilised to achieve this end is a specific focus of this article and speaks to the broader aspects of what Giroux and others have referred to as ‘public pedagogy’ which recognise public, popular and cultural spaces as pedagogical sites. The article concludes by suggesting that studies in biopedagogy would benefit not only from a more nuanced understanding of the surveillant forces of pedagogy, but also of the pedagogical flows and forces of what are seen as forms of surveillance.
Acknowledgements
With thanks to the ESRC for supporting the research on which this article is based (ESRC grant ESRC 000-22-20).
Notes
1. Dr Emma Rich, Professor John Evans, Laura De Pian (RES-000-23-2000).
2. By Professor Jan Wright, Dr Valerie Harwood, Dr Ken Cliff in Australia and Dr Lisette Burrows and Jaleh McCormack.
3. In 2003, the Government published a green paper called Every Child Matters (ECM) following the death of Victoria Climbié, a young girl who was horrifically abused and tortured, and eventually killed by her great aunt and the man with whom they lived in England. This awful event led to extensive public discourse and concern about protection of young people and the role of children's services. Tapping into these anxieties, ECM sets out five key outcomes for children and young people including: being healthy, staying safe, enjoying and achieving, making a positive contribution to society and achieving economic well-being.