ABSTRACT
In 1968 the first cohesive theory on goal setting proposed that difficult goals produce higher levels of performance than easy goals and that specific goals produce a higher level of performance than “do your best” goals. While over 40 years of research supports this theory, there has been some discrepancy regarding the use of very difficult goals. This study was designed to examine the effects on performance of different levels of performance improvement goals and two different types of feedback, as feedback is often used in conjunction with goal setting. A group design was used with participants receiving one of two goal levels, and two different types of feedback. While no significant effects were found between the two types of feedback, goal level produced significant results in terms of performance and accuracy.
KEYWORDS:
Acknowledgments
This article is adapted from a thesis submitted in partial requirement for a Master of Arts degree in psychology from the University of Nevada, Reno. The authors thank Ramona Houmanfar and Steve Rock for their contributions to this study, and the Aubrey Daniels Institute for their research support.