Identifying the Complexity of Diagnosing Bipolar Disorder: A Focused Ethnography

Abstract

Purpose: To identify and describe the complexity of diagnosing bipolar disorder, including the diagnostic process and patient experiences of being newly diagnosed with bipolar disorder.

Design: A mixed-methods focused ethnography was conducted, grounded in a post-positivist foundation.

Methods: Medical records (n = 100) of patients whose diagnosis had been switched to bipolar disorder were examined. Six weeks post-hospitalization, ten outpatients with the diagnosis of bipolar disorder underwent an in-depth interview.

Findings: Four diagnostic processes were identified during the retrospective record review. Two patterns and five themes were identified from the interviews. The first pattern, living with undiagnosed bipolar disorder, demonstrated common experiences of distinguishing impulsive moods and behavior, suffering life challenges, and seeking relief. The second pattern, acclimating to a new diagnosis of bipolar disorder, demonstrated participants’ ways of understanding the diagnosis and reconciling the diagnosis. Patterns in the interviews corroborated data from the record review.

Conclusions: The rendering of an appropriate diagnosis is key. Many participants’ lives were significantly improved when diagnosis was made, and treatment recommendations for bipolar disorder (BPD) were initiated. These findings offer clinicians and researchers new ways to think about the complexity of the diagnosis of BPD including contrasting decision-making outcomes along a screening, diagnosis, and treatment continuum, as well as using the diagnostic event to instigate meaningful life change in the patient.

Disclosure statement

No conflicts of interest exist.

Additional information

Funding

This study was funded from a grant from the Jonas Nursing and Veterans Health Care Scholarship Foundation.