4,832
Views
22
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Scholarly Dialogue on Moral and Character Education: Invited Article

Moral-Character Development for Teacher Education

Pages 194-206 | Received 03 Apr 2016, Published online: 09 Nov 2016
 

ABSTRACT

In this article the authors accept the common view that moral-character education is immanent to the life of classroom and schools and inevitable even when remanded to the hidden curriculum. Most schools claim to address the moral formation of students, and many educators enter the profession for values-laden reasons. Yet the language of values, virtues, morality, and character are notably absent from licensure and accreditation standards and so is formal training in moral-character education in schools of education. To facilitate the development of formal training in the moral work of teaching the authors organize the literature around three training objectives: Best Practice (“Good Learner”), Broad Character Education (“Fortified Good Learner”), and Intentional Moral-Character Education (“Moral Self”). Only the latter aims to move the Fortified Good Learner to the Moral Self and treats moral valuation as the explicit target of education. The authors make several suggestions for doing so and conclude with some challenges for teacher education.

Notes

1. By right relation Stengel and Tom (Citation2006) mean relationships ordered by normative ethical considerations, including those that govern proper relations among teachers, administrators, parents, teachers, and peers, but also ethical considerations that arise in academic lessons about history (e.g., between Indians and settlers), social studies (political actors, the requirements of citizenry) or literatures (characters in fictional stories or poems).

2. Moral and character education can take different forms depending on paradigmatic allegiances, ranging from dilemma discussion to advance moral reasoning to explicit instruction about virtues. We endorse an integrative approach that elides these concerns (Lapsley & Narvaez, Citation2006; Lapsley & Yeager, Citation2013).

Additional information

Notes on contributors

Daniel Lapsley

Daniel Lapsley is the ACE Collegiate Professor of Psychology and Senior Academic Advisor for the Alliance for Catholic Education at the University of Notre Dame.

Ryan Woodbury

Ryan Woodbury is a doctoral student in the Developmental Psychology program at the University of Notre Dame.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 137.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.