426
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Corrections

Correction

Pages 1972-1976 | Received 01 Apr 2019, Accepted 03 Apr 2019, Published online: 02 Sep 2019
View correction statement:
Quasi-Equilibrium Problems and Fixed Point Theorems of Separately l.s.c and u.s.c Mappings

Article title: Quasi-Equilibrium problems and fixed point theorems of separately l.s.c and u.s.c mappings

Author: Nguyen Xuan Tan

Journal: Numer. Funct. Anal. Optim.

Bibliometrics: Volume 39 (2018), Number. 02, pages. 233–255

DOI: 10.1080/01630563.2017.1360346

We formulated and proved the following theorem in the above article:

Theorem 3.1.

We assume that the following conditions hold:

  1. D, K are nonempty convex compact sets;

  2. P:D×K2D is a continuous multivalued mapping with nonempty closed convex values;

  3. Q:D×K2K is a u.s.c multivalued mapping with nonempty closed convex values;

  4. F:D×K2X×Z is a separately l.s.c and u.s.c multivalued mapping;

  5. For any (x,y)P(x,y)×Q(x,y),F(x,y) has nonempty convex closed values and =F(x,y)TP(x,y)×Q(x,y)(x,y).

Then there exists (x¯,y¯)D×K such that

  1. x¯P(x¯,y¯);

  2. y¯Q(x¯,y¯);

  3. 0F(x¯,y¯).

We used in (3.5) infuF(x¯,y¯)maxiI(x¯,y¯)pj(i)(u)=maxiI(x¯,y¯)infuF(x¯,y¯)pj(i)(u).

But, the correct use the Sion’ minimax Theorem must be infuF(x¯,y¯)maxpj(i)Mpj(i)(u)=maxpj(i)MinfuF(x¯,y¯)pj(i)(u).

Here, {pj(i)}iI(x¯,y¯)=M=co¯{pj(1),,pj(s)}. Therefore, the proof of this theorem is not correct.

Now, we give a new proof for this theorem as follow:

Proof of Theorem 3.1.

We set B={(x,y)D×K|xP(x,y), yQ(x,y)}.

Since the multivalued mapping T:D×K2D×K, defined by T(x,y)=P(x,y)×Q(x,y),  (x,y)D×K, is upper semi-continuous with nonempty convex and closed values, by using the Ky Fan fixed point Theorem, we conclude that T has a fixed point in D × K. Therefore, B is a nonempty set. The upper semi-continuity and the closedness of values of T imply that B is a closed and then a compact set.

Assume that for any (x,y)B, )0F(x,y). Since F(x, y) is a nonempty closed convex set, by the Hahn-Banach Theorem, there exists p(X×Z)* such that infwF(x,y)p(w)<0.

Further, we define functions cp1(.,.),cp2(.,.):D×KR{} by cp1(x,y)=infuF(x,y)p(u);cp2(x,y)=supwF(x,y)p(w).

By Proposition 2.2, the functions cp1 and cp2 are u.s.c on D×K, therefore, the sets Up(x)={xD|cp1(x,y)<0},Up(y)={yK|cp2(x,y)<0}, are open. Since (x,y)Up=Up(x)×Up(y), and so Up is a nonempty open neighborhood of (x,y).

Thus, for any (x,y)B there is p(X×Z)* such that Up(x,y)={(x,y)D×K|cp1(x,y)<0,cp2(x,y)<0} is nonempty and open and hence {Up}p(X×Z)* is an open cover of B. Since B is compact, there exist finite p1,,ps(X×Z)* such that Bj=1sUpj.

Further, since B is closed in D×K,Up0=D×KB is open in D × K and hence {Up0,Up1,,Ups} is an open cover of the compact set D×K. By Theorem 2.8 in Section 2 in [1], there exist continuous functions ψi:D×KR,(i=0,1,,s) such that

  1. 0ψi(x,y)1;

  2. i=1sψi(x,y)=1,  for all  (x,y)D×K;

  3. for any  i{0,1,,s}, there exists j(i){0,,s} such that suppψj(i)Upj(i).

We define the function ϕ:D×K×D×KR by ϕ((x,y),(t,z))=i=0sψj(i)(x,y).pj(i)(tx,zy),   for any   t,xD,z,yK.

Then, ϕ is a continuous function on (D×K)×(D×K). Moreover, for any fixed (x,y)D×K,ϕ((x,y),.):D×KR is an affine function and ϕ((x,y),(x,y))=0 for all (x,y)D×K. Further, we define the multivalued mapping N:D×K2D by N(x,y)={(v,w)P(x,y)×Q(x,y)|ϕ((x,y),(v,w))ϕ((x,y),(t,z)),  for all  (t,z)P(x,y)×Q(x,y)}.

Since ϕ is a continuous function and P(x,y)×Q(x,y) is a compact set, ϕ(((x,y),.):D×KR is an affine function,we conclude that N(x, y) is a nonempty convex and closed subset, for any fixed (x,y)D×K. It is also easy to prove that N is a closed mapping and then is a upper semi-continuous multivalued mapping with nonempty convex compact values. Therefore, the multivalued mapping N:D×K2D×K is a u.s.c multivalued mapping with nonempty convex compact values. Applying the Ky Fan fixed point Theorem again, we conclude that there exists (x¯,y¯)D×K such that (x¯,y¯)N(x¯,y¯). This follows ϕ((x¯,y¯),(t,z))0, for all (t,z)P(x¯,y¯)×Q(x¯,y¯). This gives (1) i=0sψi(x¯,y¯).pj(i)(tx¯,zy¯))0,  for all   (t,z)P(x¯,y¯)×Q(x¯,y¯).(1)

Setting p*=i=0sψi(x¯,y¯).pj(i), we get from Equation(1), p*(tx¯,zy¯))  0, for all (t,z)P(x¯,y¯)×Q(x¯,y¯) and hence p*(u)0, for all uTP(x¯,y¯)×Q(x¯,y¯)(x¯,y¯). By assumption (v),F(x,y)TP(x,y)×Q(x¯,y¯)(x¯,y¯)=, we conclude that p*(v)0,   for all    vF(x¯,y¯)TP(x¯,y¯)×Q(x¯,y¯)(x¯,y¯).

This yields infvF(x¯,y¯)TP(x¯,y¯)×Q(x¯,y¯)(x¯,y¯)p*(v)0 and (2) supvF(x¯,y¯)TP(x¯,y¯)×Q(x¯,y¯)(x¯,y¯)p*(v)0.(2)

Now, we assert that for any convex subset AD×K, the following equality holds (3) p*(A)=i=0sψi(x¯,y¯).pj(i)(A).(3)

Indeed, for any vA,p*(v)=i=0sψi(x¯,y¯).pj(i)(v). This shows p*(A)i=0sψi(x¯,y¯).pj(i)(A).

We need to verify i=0sψi(x¯,y¯).pj(i)(A)p*(A).

Take wi=0sψi(x¯,y¯).pj(i)(A), we can write w=i=0sψi(x¯,y¯).pj(i)(vi) with viA, for i=0,,s. By the definition of p*, we have p*(ψm(x¯,y¯)vm)=i=0sψi(x¯,y¯).pj(i)(ψm(x¯,y¯)vm),m=0,,s.

Taking the sum of the both sides of these equalities, we obtain p*(m=0sψm(x¯,y¯)vm)=m=0sψm(x¯,y¯)w=w.

Setting v=m=0sψm(x¯,y¯)vm and using the convexity of A, we conclude w=p*(v)p*(A). Thus, we have the proof of Equation(3). Inserting A=F(x¯,y¯)TP(x¯,y¯)×Q(x¯,y¯)(x¯,y¯) in Equation(3), we deduce p*(F(x¯,y¯)TP(x¯,y¯)×Q(x¯,y¯)(x¯,y¯))=i=0sψi(x¯,y¯).pj(i)(F(x¯,y¯)TP(x¯,y¯)×Q(x¯,y¯)(x¯,y¯)).

This gives infwF(x¯,y¯)TP(x¯,y¯)×Q(x¯,y¯)(x¯,y¯))p*(w)=i=0sinfw(F(x¯,y¯)TP(x¯,y¯)×Q(x¯,y¯)(x¯,y¯))ψi(x¯,y¯).pj(i)(w)maxi=0,sinfwF(x¯,y¯)TP(x¯,y¯)×Q(x¯,y¯)(x¯,y¯))pj(i)(w)} and (4) supwF(x¯,y¯)TP(x¯,y¯)×Q(x¯,y¯)(x¯,y¯))p*(w)=i=0ssupw(F(x¯,y¯)TP(x¯,y¯)×Q(x¯,y¯)(x¯,y¯))ψi(x¯,y¯).pj(i)(w)maxi=0,,ssupwF(x¯,y¯)TP(x¯,y¯)×Q(x¯,y¯)(x¯,y¯))pj(i)(w)}.(4)

Put I(x¯,y¯)={i{0,1,,s}|ψi(x¯,y¯)>0}. Since ψi(x¯,y¯)0 and (Tex translation failed) we deduce I(x¯,y¯)=. So, for any iI(x¯,y¯),(x¯,y¯)suppψj(i)Upj(i). This yields infwF(x¯,y¯)TP(x¯,y¯)×Q(x¯,y¯)(x¯,y¯)pj(i)(w)=cpj(i)1(x¯,y¯)<0,supwF(x¯,y¯)TP(x¯,y¯)×Q(x¯,y¯)(x¯,y¯)pj(i)(w)=cpj(i)2(x¯,y¯)<0, and then maxiI(x¯,y¯)max{cpj(i)1(x¯,y¯);cpj(i)2(x¯,y¯)}<0.

Therefore, together with Equation(4), we have infwF(x¯,y¯)TP(x¯,y¯)×Q(x¯,y¯)(x¯,y¯)p*(w)infiI(x¯,y¯)ψi(x¯,y¯){infwF(x¯,y¯)TP(x¯,y¯)×Q(x¯,y¯)(x¯,y¯)pj(i)(w)}maxiI(x¯,y¯)cpj(i)1(x¯,y¯)<0 and (5) supwF(x¯,y¯)TP(x¯,y¯)×Q(x¯,y¯)(x¯,y¯)p*(w)maxiI(x¯,y¯)ψi(x¯,y¯){supwF(x¯,y¯)TP(x¯,y¯)×Q(x¯,y¯)(x¯,y¯)pj(i)(w)}maxiI(x¯,y¯)cpj(i)2(x¯,y¯)<0.(5)

A combination of Equation(2) and Equation(5) gives a contradiction. This completes the proof of the theorem.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Viet Nam Academy of Science and Technologies under the code NVCC01.14/19-19. The author is a member of the project “Joint study in Analysis and Geometr” conducted at the International Centre for Research and Training in Mathematics, Institute of Mathematics, VAST, ICRTM01–2019.05.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.