275
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Vegetables, but Not Pickled Vegetables, Are Negatively Associated With the Risk of Breast Cancer

, , , &
Pages 443-453 | Received 11 Mar 2009, Accepted 21 Sep 2009, Published online: 27 Apr 2010
 

Abstract

This study investigated the association between pickled vegetable consumption and the risk of breast cancer using a validated food frequency questionnaire. A total of 358 patients with breast cancer who were matched to 360 healthy controls by age (using a 5-yr age distribution) were recruited from the National Cancer Center in South Korea. After adjusting for nondietary risk factors, total vegetable intake was inversely associated with risk of breast cancer. However, unlike nonpickled vegetables, pickled vegetable intake and its proportion relative to total vegetables were positively associated with the risk of breast cancer, and this association was more profound and consistent when pickled vegetable intake was considered as a proportion relative to total vegetables (odds ratio [OR] = 6.24, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.55–10.97; P for trend <0.001 for highest vs. lowest quartiles of intake) than as the absolute consumed amount (OR = 2.47, 95% CI = 1.45–4.21; P for trend = 0.015 for highest vs. lowest quartiles of intake). These results suggest that not only the amount of total vegetable intake but also the amounts of different types of vegetable (i.e., pickled or nonpickled) and their proportions relative to total vegetables are significantly associated with the risk of breast cancer.

View correction statement:
Erratum

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

This study was funded by the Korean Science and Engineering Foundation (grant no. R01-2007-000-11293-0) and by the second stage of BK21 Project in 2009.

Notes

aValues are means ± SD calculated using the t-test to compare each category of log transformed intake.

b n = 360.

c n = 358.

d n = 196.

e n = 210.

f n = 164.

g n = 148.

aAbbreviations are as follows: OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; Q, quartile; ref, reference; MET, metabolic equivalent unit.

b n = 360.

c n = 358.

dTotal adjusted for age (continuous), body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters; <18.5, 18.5 to <23, 23 to <25, and ≥25), family history of breast cancer (yes, no), current use of dietary supplements (yes, no), education (≤elementary school, middle school, high school, and ≥college), occupation (housewife, profession/office worker, sales/service, agriculture/laborer/unemployed, and others), smoking (nonsmoker, ex-smoker, current smoker), alcohol intake (never, ever), physical activity (MET min/wk; ≤396, 396 to <1,272, 1,272 to <2,772, and ≥2,772), menopausal status (premenopausal, postmenopausal), age at menarche (≤13, 14, 15, and ≥16), parity (yes, no), total energy intake (continuous); premenopausal: adjusted for the same covariates as the model among total subjects with the exception of menopausal status; postmenopausal: additionally adjusted for postmenopausal hormone use (never, ever).

e n = 196.

f n = 210.

g n = 164.

h n = 148.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 633.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.