99
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Lack of Association Between Insulin Sensitivity and Colorectal Adenoma Risk

, , , , , & show all
Pages 6-11 | Published online: 13 Dec 2010
 

Abstract

Insulin resistance is thought to mediate the association between obesity and colorectal neoplasia, but no prior studies have assessed stimulated insulin sensitivity as a risk factor for colorectal neoplasia. This prospective study examined the association between insulin sensitivity measured directly using the frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test (FSIGT) and later risk of colorectal adenomas. Among participants with a range of glucose tolerance levels enrolled in the Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study, colonoscopies were conducted on 600 participants ages ≥50 yr, regardless of symptoms, about 10 yr after the first FSIGT and 5 yr after the second. Multiple logistic regression analyses were used. Within this cohort, diabetes was not associated with colorectal adenoma risk [∼10 yr prior to colonoscopy adjusted odds ratio (ORadj) 1.00; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.62–1.62 or ∼5 yr prior to colonoscopy ORadj 0.96; 95% CI, 0.62–1.50]. Among non-diabetic participants, insulin sensitivity was not associated with colorectal adenoma risk at either prior study visit [lowest vs. highest insulin sensitivity, ∼10 yr prior to colonoscopy ORadj 0.93; 95% CI 0.50–1.71 and ∼5 yr prior to colonscopy ORadj 0.74; 95% CI, 0.38–1.46]. These results suggest that factors other than insulin sensitivity mediate the relationship between obesity and colorectal neoplasia.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The Colorectal Ancillary Study to the Insulin Resistance and Atherosclerosis Study Cohort was funded by grants from the National Cancer Institute (1R01CA88007, NIH R01 CA 88008). We are grateful to the study participants and the staff at the clinical centers.

Notes

*Pearson χ2 test.

1 n = 572 with BMI measures obtained.

1Adjusted for age at colonoscopy and sex using logistic regression.

2Adjusted for age at colonoscopy, center, race/ethnicity, smoking status at colonoscopy, sex, and previous screening (self-reported none, yes without polyp(s), yes with polyp(s)) using logistic regression.

3 n = 599.

4As the range of insulin sensitivity is limited in diabetics, analyses were only reported among non-diabetic participants.

5 n = 434.

6 n = 571.

7 n = 573.

8 n = 576.

9 n = 360.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 633.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.