145
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The Impact of Preoperative Underweight Status on Postoperative Complication and Survival Outcome of Gastric Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , , , & show all
Pages 1254-1263 | Received 14 Jun 2018, Accepted 03 Dec 2018, Published online: 26 Jan 2019
 

Abstract

Objective: In this study, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the impact of preoperative underweight status on postoperative complications and survival outcome of gastric cancer (GC) patients.

Methods: The related studies were identified by searching PubMed and Embase databases. According to the body mass index (BMI), all patients were classified into underweight group (<18.5 kg/m2) and normal weight group (≥18.5 kg/m2, <25 kg/m2). The relevant data were extracted and pooled effect size were assessed using a fixed effect model or random effect model.

Results: A total of 12 studies were included in this meta-analysis. The results indicated that underweight patients had a higher risk of postoperative complications than normal weight patients (RR: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.01–1.61, P < 0.05; I2 = 57.3%), especially for pulmonary infection (RR: 1.58, 95% CI: 1.03–2.43, P < 0.05; I2 = 47.7%). However, there was no significant difference between underweight and normal weight patients for major surgery-related complications such as anastomotic leakage, wound infection, and intra-abdominal infection. In addition, the short-term (RR: 2.12, 95% CI: 1.47–3.06, P < 0.001; I2 = 0%) and long-term survival (HR: 1.53, 95% CI: 1.14–2.07, P < 0.01; I2 = 64.0%) of underweight patients was significantly poorer than that of normal weight patients.

Conclusion: Preoperative underweight status was significantly associated with unfavorable postoperative outcome of GC patients. The status may represent excessive nutritional consumption and malnutrition resulting from aggressive tumor.

Author Contributions

Study conception and design: Bochao Zhao and Jingting Zhang; Collection and acquisition of data: Bochao Zhao, Shihui Zou and Rui Luo; Analysis and interpretation of data: Bochao Zhao, Jingting Zhang and Jiale Zhang; Drafting of manuscript: Bochao Zhao; Critical revision: Huimian Xu and Baojun Huang.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning province (NO. 20180530026).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 633.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.