67
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The Prognostic Value of the Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) in Radically Resected Esophagogastric Junction Adenocarcinoma

ORCID Icon, , , , , & show all
Pages 2589-2596 | Received 01 Nov 2019, Accepted 19 Oct 2020, Published online: 02 Nov 2020
 

Abstract

To determine the influence of preoperative prognostic nutritional index in adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction, this study was conducted to analyze 420 patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction who underwent surgery. A total of 120 healthy volunteers were included as the healthy control group. The cutoff values of prognostic nutritional index for predicting survival were obtained according to the receiver operating characteristic curve. The clinic-pathological feature and survival were compared between low and high prognostic nutritional index group. Results showed that the prognostic nutritional index in the patient group was lower than that in the healthy control group (P < 0.05). The level of prognostic nutritional index was significantly associated with tumor differentiation, Siewert type, tumor size, body mass index, and hemoglobin levels (P < 0.05). The level of prognostic nutritional index was negatively correlated with age of onset, tumor differentiation, Siewert type, tumor size, depth of tumor, but positively associated with the levels of body mass index and hemoglobin. Multivariate analysis revealed that prognostic nutritional index was an independent factor associated with disease-free survival (P = 0.027) and overall survival (P = 0.003). In conclusion, low prognostic nutritional index may be considered as an independent adverse prognostic marker in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful for the Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University to support this research.

Disclosure Statement

All authors state no conflict of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

The conception and design of the study was done by KG, CF and JW. Acquisition and analysis of the data was done by KG, CF, DZ, HY, QW, WC and JW. The writing, review, and/or revision of the manuscript were done by KG, CF, DZ. The study supervision was done by JW.

Ethics Statement

The study was approved by ethics committee of the Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University (No. 2020019).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 633.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.