134
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Impact of Preoperative Nutritional Indicator on Poor Postoperative Outcomes in Geriatric Patients with Colorectal Cancer

, , , , , & show all
Pages 1347-1355 | Received 08 Jan 2021, Accepted 16 Jun 2021, Published online: 21 Sep 2021
 

Abstract

The present study aimed to analyze the association between preoperative nutritional assessment and poor postoperative outcomes in geriatric patients with colorectal cancer. This retrospective study included 138 patients aged ≥80 years with colorectal cancer who underwent surgery from January 2013 to December 2018. Patients were classified into two groups according to outcomes, poor group and normal group. Clinicopathological factors were compared between the groups, and the relationships of several nutritional indices were examined. There was no significant difference in sex, age, or preoperative comorbidities. There were significant differences in volume of blood loss and proportion of laparoscopic surgery. The group with poor outcomes had significantly higher neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS) than the group with normal outcomes. Multivariate analysis revealed that open approach, high NLR, and category D mGPS were independent risk factors of poor postoperative outcomes in elderly patients with colorectal cancer. Our findings indicate that mGPS and NLR could be useful nutritional indicators of short-term outcomes of surgical treatment in geriatric patients with colorectal cancer. They can be evaluated based on albumin and C-reactive protein levels and blood count, which are inexpensive and beneficial to use in routine clinical practice.

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge the work of past and present members of our facility.

Disclosure Statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, T.N., upon reasonable request.

Additional information

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 633.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.