126
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The Prognostic Value of Prognostic Nutritional Index in Patients with Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

&
Pages 73-81 | Received 31 Mar 2022, Accepted 18 Jul 2022, Published online: 28 Jul 2022
 

Abstract

Controversy still exists with regard to the prognostic value of prognostic nutritional index (PNI) in ovarian cancer. A systematic search based on the databases of Web of Science, Embase, PubMed, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and WanFang Dataset were conducted up to March 22, 2022. We included both retrospective and prospective observational studies with comparison of prognosis of patients who were divided into two groups: low and high PNI group. The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) was applied to evaluate the quality of enrolled studies. All analyses were performed using Stata software. The pooled results were reported as hazard ratios (HRs) with the 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). Finally, 12 studies involving 3,190 patients were included. High PNI group had a significantly improved overall survival (OS, HR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.53–0.84), progression-free survival (PFS, HR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.63–0.87), and cancer-specific survival (CSS, HR: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.20–0.94) compared with the low PNI group. The sensitivity analysis and publication bias indicated our results were reliable. PNI could be applied as a promising index to predict prognosis in ovarian cancer. Our results need to be validated in future studies.

Authors’ Contributions

Hongqin Chen conceived and designed the analyses. Xi Tan and Hongqin Chen performed the literature search and selection, collected data, conducted statistical analyses and wrote the paper. All authors contributed substantially to its revision.

Disclosure Statement

The authors declare that there are no competing interests associated with this manuscript.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Funding

The author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data used in this meta-analysis were presented in the manuscript.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 633.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.