ABSTRACT
This study aims to establish whether the processing of different connectives (e.g., and, but) and different coherence relations (addition, contrast) can be modulated by a structural feature of the connected segments—namely, parallelism. While but is mainly used to contrast two expressions, and occurs in many different relations and has been shown to come with a processing cost. We report three self-paced reading experiments in which we manipulate whether the connected segments share a common verb phrase. Such parallel constructions frequently occur in contrastive relations, although they are typically treated as additive in comprehension research. We expect that parallelism will compensate for the cognitive complexity of contrast and for the ambiguity of and by further signaling the coherence relation. Our results indicate that parallelism speeds up processing and provides further evidence for priming in comprehension. However, parallelism interacted with connective ambiguity in an overt disambiguation task (Experiment 3) but not in a more natural reading task (Experiment 2). We argue that the processing of contrast remains shallow unless disambiguation is explicitly required.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.
Notes
1. This effect was found only in Knoeferle’s (Citation2014) Experiments 2 and 3, where the conjoined clauses depended on a common verb (e.g., The policeman reported that X and Y). In coordinated contexts between two main clauses (her Experiment 1, more similar to our materials), she found no main effect of conjunction and no interaction.
2. We ran the same analysis of reading times on the nonfiltered data set (i.e., including incorrect answers to the disambiguation questions) and the models returned the same effects.