362
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Compensating for processing difficulty in discourse: Effect of parallelism in contrastive relations

ORCID Icon &
Pages 862-879 | Published online: 20 Oct 2020
 

ABSTRACT

This study aims to establish whether the processing of different connectives (e.g., and, but) and different coherence relations (addition, contrast) can be modulated by a structural feature of the connected segments—namely, parallelism. While but is mainly used to contrast two expressions, and occurs in many different relations and has been shown to come with a processing cost. We report three self-paced reading experiments in which we manipulate whether the connected segments share a common verb phrase. Such parallel constructions frequently occur in contrastive relations, although they are typically treated as additive in comprehension research. We expect that parallelism will compensate for the cognitive complexity of contrast and for the ambiguity of and by further signaling the coherence relation. Our results indicate that parallelism speeds up processing and provides further evidence for priming in comprehension. However, parallelism interacted with connective ambiguity in an overt disambiguation task (Experiment 3) but not in a more natural reading task (Experiment 2). We argue that the processing of contrast remains shallow unless disambiguation is explicitly required.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.

Notes

1. This effect was found only in Knoeferle’s (Citation2014) Experiments 2 and 3, where the conjoined clauses depended on a common verb (e.g., The policeman reported that X and Y). In coordinated contexts between two main clauses (her Experiment 1, more similar to our materials), she found no main effect of conjunction and no interaction.

2. We ran the same analysis of reading times on the nonfiltered data set (i.e., including incorrect answers to the disambiguation questions) and the models returned the same effects.

Additional information

Funding

This research was supported by the H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Individual Fellowship, grant number 794575.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 192.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.