385
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Psychological Inertia Revisited: Replicating and Extending the Differential Effect of Proactive and Reactive Criminal Thinking on Crime Continuity

ORCID Icon
Pages 156-170 | Received 12 Sep 2016, Accepted 02 Aug 2017, Published online: 05 Jan 2018
 

ABSTRACT

Measures of proactive and reactive criminal thinking were evaluated as putative mediators of the past crime‒future crime relationship in a group of 1,354 adjudicated delinquents. Analyses performed on total offending variety scores and aggressive offending frequency scores revealed that reactive but not proactive criminal thinking mediated the past crime‒future crime relationship. As in previous studies, proactive criminal thinking failed to correlate with prior criminal offending. These results have theoretical implications for continued development of the criminal thinking-mediated moral and control models of criminal lifestyle development and practical implications for effective treatment, management, and prevention of serious criminality.

Notes on contributor

GLENN D. WALTERS is a professor in the Department of Criminal Justice at Kutztown University (Pennsylvania), where he teaches classes in corrections, criminology, substance misuse and crime, and research methods. Prior to this, he spent 29 years working as a correctional psychologist in various military and federal facilities, to include the United States Penitentiary at Leavenworth, Kansas. Dr. Walters’ current research interests include offender assessment, classification, and treatment, causal mediation analysis, and the development of an overarching psychological theory of criminal behavior.

Notes

1 Follow-up periods were not 6 months in all cases, although over 90% of the follow-ups ranged in length from 5 to 7 months. All analyses were therefore recalculated controlling for length of Wave 1 follow-up in the equation predicting Wave 1 offending and length of Wave 3 follow-up in the equation predicting Wave 3 offending. Given that the results did not change the simpler analyses in which length of follow-up was not included in the regression equations as a control variable are reported in this article.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 324.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.